Skip to content

fix: revert back to old register naming - #1053

Merged
DavePearce merged 2 commits into
v1.0-linefrom
1052-feat-use-old-perspective-naming-for-v10-line
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

fix: revert back to old register naming#1053
DavePearce merged 2 commits into
v1.0-linefrom
1052-feat-use-old-perspective-naming-for-v10-line

Conversation

@DavePearce

@DavePearce DavePearce commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The purpose of this change is to revert the naming for columns to how it was under v1.0.8, in order to ensure compatibility with the existing mainnet setup (which uses v1.0.8 and a corresponding tracer). Specifically, column names will not include perspective names. This is clearly suboptimal as it can (potentially) lead to name clashes. However, such clashes are always reported as duplicated column errors.

This puts back in place the old register naming.
A number of perspective-related tests were now failing due to the change
in column naming.  Specifically, because the wrong names were being used
in accepts/rejects files leading to "missing column in trace" errors,
etc.
@DavePearce
DavePearce force-pushed the 1052-feat-use-old-perspective-naming-for-v10-line branch from 0d24c87 to ed6d953 Compare July 29, 2025 21:54
@DavePearce
DavePearce merged commit f601a8e into v1.0-line Jul 29, 2025
4 checks passed
@DavePearce
DavePearce deleted the 1052-feat-use-old-perspective-naming-for-v10-line branch July 29, 2025 23:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant