Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2025 Hyperledger Aries Annual Review #99

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 7, 2025

Conversation

swcurran
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Stephen Curran [email protected]

@swcurran swcurran changed the title 2025 Hyperledger Aries Annual Report 2025 Hyperledger Aries Annual Review Jan 30, 2025
@tkuhrt
Copy link
Contributor

tkuhrt commented Jan 30, 2025

TAC Reviewers: @tkuhrt (Primary) @hendrikebbers (secondary)

Signed-off-by: Stephen Curran <[email protected]>
@tkuhrt
Copy link
Contributor

tkuhrt commented Feb 4, 2025

Here are the remaining public (not archived) Aries repositories:

From the above list, it appears that the first three have been modified in the last month, and the rest sometime in 2024. Is the intent to move the first three to OWF and to archive the rest? If so, we can start the archive process now.

@hendrikebbers
Copy link
Member

To do a review I need some more background regarding the transition to OpenWallet Foundation. @tkuhrt @swcurran who can help me. We maybe can discuss in TAC meeting or by a short call.

@swcurran
Copy link
Contributor Author

swcurran commented Feb 4, 2025

@tkuhrt , here is the expected disposition:

  • aries-rfcs — in process of being moved to the DIDComm Working Group at DIF. The repo move is a bit problematic — hoping to see if we can get some lenience to make the move a bit easier.
  • aries — this is an umbrella repo created at the start of LFDT. Archive.
  • aries-vcx — the maintainers plan to apply to move this Rust framework to OWF.
    aries-framework-swift — maintainer wants to keep it active a bit longer to see if a move to OWF makes sense, or to just archive it.
    aries-uniffi-wrappers — same as above (Swift)
    aries-framework-kotlin — same as above (Swift)
    aries-bbs-go — no response from the maintainer. I assume archive, but don’t know.
    aries-bbssignatures-rs — archive.

@swcurran
Copy link
Contributor Author

swcurran commented Feb 4, 2025

To do a review I need some more background regarding the transition to OpenWallet Foundation. @tkuhrt @swcurran who can help me. We maybe can discuss in TAC meeting or by a short call.

Happy to go over this. Basically, Aries was a set of frameworks that implemented the “Aries Interop Profiles” (1, 2) that consisted of DIDComm, AnonCreds, and a set of DIDComm protocols — really good stuff. Over time, one Framework (Go) lost it’s maintainers (the SecureKey team that went to Gen), and the rest migrated over to the OpenWallet Foundation. At this point, all except Aries VCX and the Swift/Kotlin frameworks have moved, with the Aries VCX planned for Real Soon Now. As such, Aries can be archived.

@JamesKEbert
Copy link

FYI here's the proposal for the Aries VCX move to OWF - openwallet-foundation/project-proposals#54

Signed-off-by: Tracy Kuhrt <[email protected]>
@tkuhrt
Copy link
Contributor

tkuhrt commented Mar 7, 2025

Reviewed and agreed to archive during the February 13, 2025 meeting

@tkuhrt tkuhrt merged commit b468c0b into LF-Decentralized-Trust:main Mar 7, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants