Expose cryptography backends via CryptoProvider #452
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a
CryptoProvider
struct that allows replacing the built-in providers with something custom.All the details from this implementation that could be considered "interesting" are stolen straight from
rustls
's CryptoProvider.I've marked the
new_signer
,new_verifier
and JWK functions from the two built in backends aspub
, so you can do stuff like this:i.e. overwrite just specific algorithms.
One area I'm a little unsure about is
JwkUtils
, 1) about the name and 2) about theDefault
implementation. TheCryptoProvider::signer_
andCryptoProvider::verifier_factory
functions are obviously mandatory for a custom provider, but not everyone uses JWK, so the default just uses dummy functions withunimplemented!()
.