Decoupled crypto backends (the rest) #428
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
# Conflicts: # Cargo.toml # examples/custom_header.rs # examples/validation.rs # src/crypto/ecdsa.rs # src/crypto/rsa.rs # src/jwk.rs
This is following the existing scheme established in hmac & rsa.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is following up on #410 with the rest of the decoupled implementations, and addressing most of the review comments (I think?).
There are still some todos left for documentation, which I haven't filled in yet.
I've verified that tests & clippy pass with all combinations of features, but a lot of this I only know enough about to be dangerous, so I'd appreciate close looks at the actual implementations to make sure e.g. I've picked the correct library functions in each case.