New package: PeriodicHiddenMarkovModels v0.1.2

[JuliaRegistrator]

• Registering package: PeriodicHiddenMarkovModels
• Repository: https://github.com/dmetivie/PeriodicHiddenMarkovModels.jl
• Created by: @dmetivie
• Version: v0.1.2
• Commit: 4f656ebfaaace5a53e84f218df86f1f53f00a336
• Reviewed by: @dmetivie
• Reference: dmetivie/PeriodicHiddenMarkovModels.jl@4f656eb#commitcomment-128064289
• Description: Extension of the package HMMBase.jl that deals with non-homogenous Hidden Markov Models

[github-actions]

Your new package pull request met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged when the mandatory waiting period (3 days) has elapsed.

Since you are registering a new package, please make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines: https://julialang.github.io/Pkg.jl/dev/creating-packages/#Package-naming-guidelines-1

---

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment. You can edit blocking comments, adding [noblock] to them in order to unblock auto-merging.

[gdalle]

[noblock]

Hey @dmetivie! Congrats on the package :)
I just wanted to let you know that HMMBase.jl has been archived, and that HiddenMarkovModels.jl is its designated successor. Perhaps depending on it is a better idea?
Let me know if there are things that don't work for you.

[dmetivie]

[noblock]

Ho woah, I was reading that when I got your message!
In fact, I worked on PerdiodicHMM.jl a while ago and decided just now to register it.
I did not know about HiddenMarkovModels.jl (at least my pkg name is consistent with yours!).
How did Clément Mantoux got involved in all that? (I was at CMAP with him for a bit)
How my to fit in your framework
How the in-construction SmoothPeriodicStatsModels.jl package that I am building fit ?

Some many questions, would you be available for a chat?

[gdalle]

[noblock]

How did Clément Mantoux got involved in all that? (I was at CMAP with him for a bit)

@cmantoux is one of my best friends ^^

Some many questions, would you be available for a chat?

Sure, hit me up on the Julia slack or via email at [email protected] and we'll talk ;)

[PallHaraldsson]

[noblock]

@gdalle FYI: You blocked registration of the package. Both of you @dmetivie need to [unblock], and I though putting [unblock] in your last comment would be enough, but I'm apparently wrong. I guess it happens if you update all of your comments.

If you unblock/register now it would become package 9999, or if you time right then package 10,000...

[gdalle]

[noblock]

This was voluntary on my end, we're having a meeting tomorrow with @dmetivie to see if we can work together on this

[PallHaraldsson]

[noblock]

@gdalle it seems both of you want to unblock, but it seems it didn't happen, since you missed adding [unblock] to your first comment here. Since both of your have otherwise unblocked then now it's in your hands if it gets unblocked early or as package 10,000.

If by "working together" and "voluntary on my end" you mean maybe this package should NOT be registered, rather merged into yours then, maybe not unblock...

[gdalle]

[noblock]

Yeah I left the first comment unchanged on purpose since I didn't know if @dmetivie wanted to wait for our meeting. But since he modified his comment in the meantime to unblock, I assume he wants to register and that's also fine by me. We can always tag a new version after if we decide to join forces

[dmetivie]

[noblock]

Thanks! I had no clues about no/blocking and I thought Julia was already over 10,000 pkg!
@gdalle, yes in my head it was going to be the future version rebases version that would be compatible with HiddenMarkovModels.jl.
Best!

[PallHaraldsson]

Nr. 9999 is still a cool number, I was kind of hoping this one would become 10,000 though... Package 10001 is not yet registered, also a cool number.

[gdalle]

Where do you see the package number?

[dmetivie]

I just tested this it works. A few minutes ago it turned to 10000

[PallHaraldsson]

Where do you see the package number?

@gdalle
In the file here as explained there for the total:
edebill/modulecounts#58 (comment)

I.e. I have an obvious human way (look up the file and subtract 13); and already Ruby code already to extract the number.

I bumped that issue, ideally you or someone could fix there. Would be great if modulecounts.com would work by now for Julia too.

For the actual count of this package or any other, I was just monitoring https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General/commits/master

You can know the latest, it's tedious to scroll back to a not-recently registered package, right now, this one is the last one and easy.

There may be no good automated way, you would need to filter out "New package", but more importantly and ideally get the same info from some Github API.

[gdalle]

Thanks for the detailed walkthrough!