Skip to content

Conversation

@oxinabox
Copy link
Member

This is the companion to JuliaArrays/StaticArrays.jl#1228
see that PR for full details.
the tl;dr is:
These tests were breaking because of a change made in StaticArrays to how projections work (good that's their job) away from the default behavour which is implemented in this package.
It thus no longer makes sense to test StaticArrays still has the default behavour in this package.
Since we can't influence that.

Possibly we should have some other type we use to test this?

Note: this is not quiet enough to drop StaticArrays as a dependency entirely, as it is still used to test inplace accumulation into an immuatable array.

@oxinabox oxinabox requested a review from mcabbott December 27, 2023 04:54
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2c2d2bd) 93.79% compared to head (a149e8a) 93.91%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #645      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.79%   93.91%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          14       15       +1     
  Lines         886      904      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits          831      849      +18     
  Misses         55       55              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@oxinabox
Copy link
Member Author

PR is now open to move this to StaticArrays so i am happy to merge this, since that should be merged in short order
JuliaArrays/StaticArrays.jl#1231

@oxinabox oxinabox merged commit 1b0e41a into main Jan 16, 2024
@oxinabox oxinabox deleted the ox/rm_static_arrays branch January 16, 2024 11:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants