Open
Conversation
Owner
|
@bbedward There were some plans last year to revive dPoW, but don't think it ever was. I helped setting upp dpow.nanos.cc but don't seem to be used. Just thinking if we really should remove dpow completely, but I don't have any strong feelings against it. Anyway, the src/test/proxy_default.test.ts failed. Settings wrong length I think. Could you please check that. |
Author
|
I'm a little tied up but I'll try to get back to this next week. The old BPoW will be offline next week. As far as dPoW, better to remove it probably since it doesn't exist - might confuse people otherwise. |
|
still need dPoW to avoid a single point of failure, https://dpow.nanos.cc is currently being used for that |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dirty hack to maybe support BoomPoW v2, not tested but can be a grounds for someone else to refine