-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix PRINT-ALL-DOCUMENTATION locating documentation string #1736
Fix PRINT-ALL-DOCUMENTATION locating documentation string #1736
Conversation
… documentation string. (Also, MAKEFILE updated the LAMA variable in the CMLEXECCOMS.)
In the technical meeting today, we focused on the LAMA specification in the files COMS. It seems very odd (as in I have never seen it) that a file has explicit settings for the LAMA, NLAMA... variables, those were always automatically supplied and properly updated by the MAKEFILE. Is there something special about this particular file? Or are these variable settings just a historical mistake that is being carried forward. What would happen if this command is simply removed from the file? (We noted that this file is compiled by FAKE-COMPILE-FILE, if that is somehow relevant to this question.) |
@rmkaplan The changes to LAMA are the subject of my Issue #1725.
|
I don't know if removing the (DECLARE%: DONTEVAL@LOAD DOEVAL@COMPILE DONTCOPY COMPILERVARS
(ADDTOVAR NLAMA DIR)
(ADDTOVAR NLAML )
(ADDTOVAR LAMA PROCESS-EXEC-ID PRINT-EVENT PRINT-HISTORY EXEC-PRIN1 EVENTS-INPUT EVAL-INPUT EXEC-READ)
) from the |
It does seem that MAKEFILE adds/updates these commands automatically as needed in all the managed files, so I think leaving them is the right thing to do.
… On May 30, 2024, at 5:25 PM, Matt Heffron ***@***.***> wrote:
I don't know if removing the
(DECLARE%: ***@***.*** ***@***.*** DONTCOPY COMPILERVARS
(ADDTOVAR NLAMA DIR)
(ADDTOVAR NLAML )
(ADDTOVAR LAMA PROCESS-EXEC-ID PRINT-EVENT PRINT-HISTORY EXEC-PRIN1 EVENTS-INPUT EVAL-INPUT EXEC-READ)
)
from the COMS would have any effect, good or bad. It seems simplest just to leave it and include MAKEFILE's update.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1736 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQSTUJKQI37F7JK5FOAGDYLZE67PTAVCNFSM6AAAAABIISDJPGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNBRGA2DANJZHE>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
|
…f_given_name_argument
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved as per Implementors Mtg on 2024-06-03
In PRINT-ALL-DOCUMENTATION only one of two places was checked for the documentation string.
(Also, MAKEFILE updated the LAMA variable in the CMLEXECCOMS.)
Issue #1735