Skip to content

Conversation

@seungwooham
Copy link

First of all, thanks for providing us the baseline code.

This pull request contains an enhancement in data processing ipynb file. The code before took long time to search for a specific value and process it row-by-rows. Here, the adjustment was made based on the assumption the pre-processed file has 2d array with x-position and time stamp, starting from 0. (which is intuitive.)

Based on this, the time consumption for data processing has now been reduced by 1/300.

It also has some adjustments to the hyperparameters based on the comparison with the original paper.

@barbourww
Copy link
Contributor

barbourww commented May 9, 2024

@seungwooham Thank you for the submission! We will start reviewing this immediately. The end result might be that we support two input versions if needed in order to allow backwards compatibility for a while.

@junyi9
Copy link
Contributor

junyi9 commented Jun 21, 2024

@seungwooham Thanks for the submission, we'll incorperate your code logic in our next release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants