Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Coming soon: The Renovate bot (GitHub App) will be renamed to Mend. PRs from Renovate will soon appear from 'Mend'. Learn more here.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
stylelint-config-recess-order 6.0.0 -> 7.3.0 age confidence

Release Notes

stormwarning/stylelint-config-recess-order (stylelint-config-recess-order)

v7.3.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

v7.2.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

v7.1.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

v7.0.0

Compare Source

Major Changes
  • Support stylelint-order v7 (Fixes #​355, #​395) (#​403)

    Minimum supported version of stylelint is now 16.18.0, which is in line
    with stylelint-order.

    stylelint-order is now a peerDependency and no longer included with this
    package.
    It should be installed separately.

v6.1.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/stylelint-config-recess-order-7.x branch from 65bd0e1 to 71120a1 Compare June 13, 2025 22:41
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/stylelint-config-recess-order-7.x branch 2 times, most recently from 192c712 to 600ba50 Compare August 11, 2025 10:02
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/stylelint-config-recess-order-7.x branch from 600ba50 to 11d032f Compare September 5, 2025 20:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants