Skip to content

Conversation

@nikochiko
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@nikochiko has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 57 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8285e90 and 11326ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/styles/custom.css (3 hunks)
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change modifies app/styles/custom.css by removing a .semobold selector (likely a typo), expanding the h1–h6 rule selector list to include table header cells and inline text elements (strong, bold, .bold, .semibold), and fixing a missing closing brace at the end of the file to restore proper CSS block termination.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

  • Single file modification with straightforward CSS selector changes
  • Consistent pattern of additions (no complex logic or structural rework)
  • Typo fix and syntax correction with minimal risk

Potential areas of attention:

  • Verify the .semobold removal was intentional and not a regression
  • Confirm the expanded selector list doesn't introduce unintended styling cascades to table headers or inline elements
  • Validate the closing brace placement corrects the syntax without affecting other rules

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to evaluate relevance to the changeset. Add a pull request description explaining the motivation, changes, and any relevant context for this CSS fix.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'fix bold font: specify different font for strong / bold / table header' accurately reflects the main changes: fixing bold font styling and specifying fonts for strong, bold, and table header elements.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@entelligence-ai-pr-reviews
Copy link

Entelligence AI Vulnerability Scanner

Status: No security vulnerabilities found

Your code passed our comprehensive security analysis.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c244259 and 8285e90.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/styles/custom.css (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
app/styles/custom.css

[error] 169-169: Unknown type selector is not allowed.

See MDN web docs for more details.
Consider replacing the unknown type selector with valid one.

(lint/correctness/noUnknownTypeSelector)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: gitleaks
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/styles/custom.css (1)

141-171: Font family application to semantic and utility selectors is well-structured.

The expansion of the font-family rule to include headings, table headers, semantic elements (strong), and utility classes (.bold, .semibold) creates a consistent typographic hierarchy. Once the invalid bold selector is removed, this rule cleanly applies the Avenir font stack to all bold/emphasized content.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants