Add AI Law Radar (independent global AI-regulation tracker)

[romanshumy]

Adds AI Law Radar — a free, open (CC BY 4.0) tracker of AI-law obligations and deadlines across 13 jurisdictions. Every entry links to its primary source and is re-verified daily; there is a public REST API + MCP endpoint, an embeddable widget, and calendar/CSV export. Not legal advice. Thanks for maintaining this list!

[carloshvp]

Thanks for the contribution. AI Law Radar may be relevant, but the proposed entry is broad and includes several claims that need support, such as daily re-verification, open data/API/MCP availability, and coverage across 13 jurisdictions.

Could you provide maturity and usefulness evidence, such as public methodology, archive/history of updates, data/API documentation, independent users or references, and examples showing how EU AI Act obligations are sourced to primary materials?

Please also shorten the entry to one neutral EU AI Act-focused sentence. For example:

- [AI Law Radar](https://ailawradar.com) - Primary-sourced tracker for AI regulation obligations and deadlines, including EU AI Act updates.

Inclusion will depend on both credible evidence and a concise, maintainable description.

[romanshumy]

Thanks for the thoughtful review, @carloshvp — and for the suggested wording. I've shortened the entry to your neutral one-liner:

- [AI Law Radar](https://ailawradar.com) - Primary-sourced tracker for AI regulation obligations and deadlines, including EU AI Act updates.

On the evidence you asked for:

Methodology (public): https://ailawradar.com/methodology — how entries are sourced, the status scale, and the confidence flags.

Archive / history of updates: https://ailawradar.com/history ("The Record") is an append-only, field-level revision history reconstructed from version control — every change shows old value → new value, dated. There's also a human changelog (https://ailawradar.com/changelog) and an RSS feed (https://ailawradar.com/feed.xml). Each obligation carries its own "checked" date, refreshed by a daily automated re-verification pass.

Data / API documentation: https://ailawradar.com/api documents a public REST API (/api/v1/*) and an MCP endpoint (/api/mcp). The full dataset is open under CC BY 4.0 at https://ailawradar.com/data/obligations.json (machine summary: https://ailawradar.com/llms.txt).

EU AI Act obligations sourced to primary materials (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; article-level links) — examples, all on https://ailawradar.com/jurisdictions/eu:

• Art. 5 — Prohibited practices → https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/5/ (in force 2 Feb 2025)
• Art. 50 — Transparency & deepfake labelling → https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/50/ (2 Aug 2026)
• Art. 53 — GPAI obligations → https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/53/
• Art. 101 — GPAI enforcement & fines → https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/101/ (2 Aug 2026)

Each carries an effective date, a "checked" date, a confidence flag, and a maximum-penalty figure. Where timing is unsettled — e.g. the Annex III high-risk obligations under the Digital Omnibus — the entry is explicitly flagged low-confidence rather than overstated.

Independent references: AI Law Radar was independently reviewed and merged into EthicalML/awesome-artificial-intelligence-regulation and AthenaCore/AwesomeResponsibleAI this week, and submitted to the OECD.AI Catalogue of Tools for Trustworthy AI.

Happy to adjust further if you'd like — thanks again for maintaining the list.

[carloshvp]

Thanks for the detailed response and update. The methodology, revision history, API and MCP documentation, open dataset, and inclusion in two external curated lists address the maturity question. The one-line entry also meets the list format.

One sourcing issue remains. The methodology says each record links to an official primary source, and the proposed entry calls the tracker "primary-sourced." In the live dataset checked on 28 July, four of the eight EU records, Articles 5, 50, 53, and 101, link to artificialintelligenceact.eu. That is an independent Future of Life Institute resource, not an official primary source. The other four EU records use EUR-Lex.

Please replace those four links with EUR-Lex or other official EU sources, or revise the methodology and proposed entry so they do not claim primary-only sourcing. Once the dataset, site claims, and entry align, this PR looks ready for merge.