-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Coderabbit test #3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughA single line "Test for code rabbit" was added after the "# Data" header in the README.md file, along with two additional blank lines. No other files or content were modified. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
2-4: Replace placeholder text with meaningful documentationThe line “Test for code rabbit” looks like a temporary note rather than useful documentation. Consider removing it or expanding the README with context that will help future contributors or users (e.g., dataset description, format, usage examples).
Testing
Summary by CodeRabbit