Fix Czar missing carrier auto deploy functionality

[lL1l1]

Issue

CZAR does not have the CARRIER category, so blueprints-units.lua external factory processing for carriers does not pick it up:

fa/lua/system/blueprints-units.lua

Lines 675 to 698 in 3f034d1

	-- add order overrides to carriers
	if unit.CategoriesHash['CARRIER'] then
	-- override our transport function to display what we want
	-- and exhibit new behavior
	if not unit.General.OrderOverrides then
	unit.General.OrderOverrides = {}
	end
	unit.General.OrderOverrides.RULEUCC_Transport = {
	bitmapId = 'deploy',
	helpText = 'auto_deploy',
	behavior = 'AutoDeployBehavior',
	initialStateFunc = 'AutoDeployInit',
	statToggle = 'AutoDeploy',
	}
	-- add the toggle so it can be flipped to begin with
	-- but add an order override to remove it from our orders table
	if not unit.General.StatToggles then
	unit.General.StatToggles = {}
	end
	unit.General.StatToggles.AutoDeploy = true
	end

Description of the proposed changes

• Manually add in the order override and stat toggle added by blueprints-units.lua.
• Fix type annotation of the StatToggles blueprint field. Not sure why it was incorrectly written in Adds stat toggle infrastructure and switches AutoDeploy to use it #5581 5dcaac5

Testing done on the proposed changes

The button's description is corrected, and when you right click it gets highlighted and constructed units automatically deploy.

Additional context

This is the second bug I've seen because of CZAR being a flying carrier, the first being that intel/counterintel remains enabled for units inside the CZAR because its base class is that of an air transport and not a (naval) aircraft carrier.

Checklist

• Changes are annotated, including comments where useful
• Changes are documented in the changelog for the next game version

[Garanas]

What would be the downside of giving it the CARRIER category? What are the side effects?

[lL1l1]

CARRIER is frequently used as if it is implicitly a naval unit category for AI and target priorities. It's more like the DESTROYER, CRUISER, and BATTLESHIP categories where it signals a rather specific type of unit than the general ability to carry aircraft.

[Garanas]

I understand. It may also mess up existing category queries where they expect naval-based carriers, but do not specify the naval category.