{2023.06}[foss/2023a] Siesta 5.2.2, EasyBuild 5.0.0 #966

ocaisa · 2025-03-10T10:33:58Z

14 out of 76 required modules missing:

* test-drive/0.5.0-GCCcore-12.3.0 (test-drive-0.5.0-GCCcore-12.3.0.eb)
* json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0 (json-fortran-9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.eb)
* flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0 (flook-0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.eb)
* mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0 (mctc-lib-0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.eb)
* mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0 (mstore-0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.eb)
* libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0 (libfdf-0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.eb)
* TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0 (TOML-Fortran-0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.eb)
* ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0 (ruamel.yaml-0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.eb)
* xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0 (xmlf90-1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.eb)
* libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0 (libPSML-2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.eb)
* Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a (Simple-DFTD3-1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.eb)
* libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a (libGridXC-2.0.2-gompi-2023a.eb)
* PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a (PnetCDF-1.12.3-gompi-2023a.eb)
* Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a (Siesta-5.2.2-foss-2023a.eb)

```bash 14 out of 76 required modules missing: * test-drive/0.5.0-GCCcore-12.3.0 (test-drive-0.5.0-GCCcore-12.3.0.eb) * json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0 (json-fortran-9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.eb) * flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0 (flook-0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.eb) * mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0 (mctc-lib-0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.eb) * mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0 (mstore-0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.eb) * libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0 (libfdf-0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.eb) * TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0 (TOML-Fortran-0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.eb) * ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0 (ruamel.yaml-0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.eb) * xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0 (xmlf90-1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.eb) * libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0 (libPSML-2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.eb) * Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a (Simple-DFTD3-1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.eb) * libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a (libGridXC-2.0.2-gompi-2023a.eb) * PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a (PnetCDF-1.12.3-gompi-2023a.eb) * Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a (Siesta-5.2.2-foss-2023a.eb) ```

eessi-bot · 2025-03-10T10:34:01Z

Instance eessi-bot-mc-aws is configured to build for:

architectures: x86_64/generic, x86_64/intel/haswell, x86_64/intel/sapphirerapids, x86_64/intel/skylake_avx512, x86_64/amd/zen2, x86_64/amd/zen3, aarch64/generic, aarch64/neoverse_n1, aarch64/neoverse_v1
repositories: eessi.io-2023.06-software, eessi.io-2023.06-compat

eessi-bot · 2025-03-10T10:34:03Z

Instance eessi-bot-mc-azure is configured to build for:

architectures: x86_64/amd/zen4
repositories: eessi.io-2023.06-compat, eessi.io-2023.06-software

ocaisa · 2025-03-10T10:34:32Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:aarch64/neoverse_v1

eessi-bot · 2025-03-10T10:34:35Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-aws (click for details)

received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:aarch64/neoverse_v1 from ocaisa
- expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_v1
handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_v1 resulted in:
- submitted job 49709, for details & status see {2023.06}[foss/2023a] Siesta 5.2.2, EasyBuild 5.0.0 #966 (comment)

eessi-bot · 2025-03-10T10:34:35Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-azure (click for details)

received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:aarch64/neoverse_v1 from ocaisa
- expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_v1
handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_v1 resulted in:
- no jobs were submitted

eessi-bot · 2025-03-10T10:34:39Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture aarch64-neoverse_v1 for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/49709

date	job status	comment
Mar 10 10:34:38 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `49709` awaits release by job manager
Mar 10 10:35:13 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Mar 10 11:22:20 UTC 2025	running	job `49709` is running
Mar 10 12:25:25 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-49709.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-neoverse_v1-1741608572.tar.gz` size: 12 MiB (12806074 bytes) entries: 882 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_v1/modules/all `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a.lua` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a.lua` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.lua` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_v1/software `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCCcore-12.3.0` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0` other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_v1 no other files in tarball
Mar 10 12:25:25 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: perf: 967.355 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: perf: 986.342 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 3.35 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 3.15 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 4.49 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 4.52 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 0.4 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 0.41 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: bandwidth: 33247.65 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: bandwidth: 34316.5 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-49709.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

ocaisa · 2025-03-10T14:08:59Z

@migueldiascosta When I build this on Neoverse V1 I get:

99% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 257

Label Time Summary:
fe           =   8.76 sec*proc (4 tests)
long         = 452.25 sec*proc (12 tests)
polarized    =   8.76 sec*proc (4 tests)
simple       = 152.78 sec*proc (58 tests)

Total Test time (real) = 1162.06 sec

The following tests FAILED:
        192 - siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1[verify] (Failed)

and digging deeper

190/257 Test #190: siesta-12.Solvers-sih-elsi_omp1[verify] ................................   Passed    0.09 sec
        Start 191: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1
191/257 Test #191: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1 ..............................   Passed   38.15 sec
        Start 192: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1[verify]
192/257 Test #192: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1[verify] ......................***Failed    0.09 sec
SIESTA Test parameters
----------------------

The test comparison script has been run with the following parameters:

- Workdir       : /tmp/bot/easybuild/build/Siesta/5.2.2/foss-2023a/easybuild_obj/Tests/12.Solvers
- Configuration : /tmp/bot/easybuild/build/Siesta/5.2.2/foss-2023a/easybuild_obj/Tests/test-cfg.yml
- Reference file: /tmp/bot/easybuild/build/Siesta/5.2.2/foss-2023a/siesta-5.2.2/Tests/12.Solvers/Reference/si-qdot-elsi-pexsi.out
- Test file     : /tmp/bot/easybuild/build/Siesta/5.2.2/foss-2023a/easybuild_obj/Tests/12.Solvers/si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1/work/si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1.out
- Output file   : /tmp/bot/easybuild/build/Siesta/5.2.2/foss-2023a/easybuild_obj/Tests/12.Solvers/si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1/work/si-qdot-elsi-pexsi.yml

Results
-------


  - Good:  ['Edftu', 'Eso', 'Harris_E', 'EDFTD3', 'Res_force', 'Max_force', 'Stress0', 'Stress1', 'Stress2', 'Stress3', 'Stress4', 'Stress5']
  - Fail:  [{'name': 'Ebs', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': -56145.006362}, {'name': 'Eions', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 239702.476076}, {'name': 'Ena', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 
97538.858357}, {'name': 'Ekin', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 43507.671624}, {'name': 'Enl', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 17086.126286}, {'name': 'Eharris', 'value': 0.0, 'expecte
d': -111738.111498}, {'name': 'FreeEng', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': -110997.54988}, {'name': 'KS_E', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': -110997.549}, {'name': 'Etot', 'value': 0.0, '
expected': -110997.549039}, {'name': 'Cellvec0', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 45.0}, {'name': 'Cellvec1', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 45.0}, {'name': 'Cellvec2', 'value': 0.0, '
expected': 45.0}, {'name': 'Cellang0', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 90.0}, {'name': 'Cellang1', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 90.0}, {'name': 'Cellang2', 'value': 0.0, 'expected':
 90.0}]
  - Skip:  []

Test parser ran on 2025/03/10 11:54:52 +0000 (UTC).


        Start 193: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elpa-native_omp1
193/257 Test #193: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elpa-native_omp1 .............................   Passed  112.10 sec

Is that something to worry about?

ocaisa · 2025-03-10T14:14:03Z

@AnthoniAlcaraz Can you maybe comment?

migueldiascosta · 2025-03-10T14:32:50Z

@migueldiascosta When I build this on Neoverse V1 I get:

99% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 257

Label Time Summary:
fe           =   8.76 sec*proc (4 tests)
long         = 452.25 sec*proc (12 tests)
polarized    =   8.76 sec*proc (4 tests)
simple       = 152.78 sec*proc (58 tests)

Total Test time (real) = 1162.06 sec

The following tests FAILED:
        192 - siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1[verify] (Failed)

and digging deeper

190/257 Test #190: siesta-12.Solvers-sih-elsi_omp1[verify] ................................   Passed    0.09 sec
        Start 191: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1
191/257 Test #191: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1 ..............................   Passed   38.15 sec
        Start 192: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1[verify]
192/257 Test #192: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1[verify] ......................***Failed    0.09 sec
SIESTA Test parameters
----------------------

The test comparison script has been run with the following parameters:

- Workdir       : /tmp/bot/easybuild/build/Siesta/5.2.2/foss-2023a/easybuild_obj/Tests/12.Solvers
- Configuration : /tmp/bot/easybuild/build/Siesta/5.2.2/foss-2023a/easybuild_obj/Tests/test-cfg.yml
- Reference file: /tmp/bot/easybuild/build/Siesta/5.2.2/foss-2023a/siesta-5.2.2/Tests/12.Solvers/Reference/si-qdot-elsi-pexsi.out
- Test file     : /tmp/bot/easybuild/build/Siesta/5.2.2/foss-2023a/easybuild_obj/Tests/12.Solvers/si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1/work/si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1.out
- Output file   : /tmp/bot/easybuild/build/Siesta/5.2.2/foss-2023a/easybuild_obj/Tests/12.Solvers/si-qdot-elsi-pexsi_omp1/work/si-qdot-elsi-pexsi.yml

Results
-------


  - Good:  ['Edftu', 'Eso', 'Harris_E', 'EDFTD3', 'Res_force', 'Max_force', 'Stress0', 'Stress1', 'Stress2', 'Stress3', 'Stress4', 'Stress5']
  - Fail:  [{'name': 'Ebs', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': -56145.006362}, {'name': 'Eions', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 239702.476076}, {'name': 'Ena', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 
97538.858357}, {'name': 'Ekin', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 43507.671624}, {'name': 'Enl', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 17086.126286}, {'name': 'Eharris', 'value': 0.0, 'expecte
d': -111738.111498}, {'name': 'FreeEng', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': -110997.54988}, {'name': 'KS_E', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': -110997.549}, {'name': 'Etot', 'value': 0.0, '
expected': -110997.549039}, {'name': 'Cellvec0', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 45.0}, {'name': 'Cellvec1', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 45.0}, {'name': 'Cellvec2', 'value': 0.0, '
expected': 45.0}, {'name': 'Cellang0', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 90.0}, {'name': 'Cellang1', 'value': 0.0, 'expected': 90.0}, {'name': 'Cellang2', 'value': 0.0, 'expected':
 90.0}]
  - Skip:  []

Test parser ran on 2025/03/10 11:54:52 +0000 (UTC).


        Start 193: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elpa-native_omp1
193/257 Test #193: siesta-12.Solvers-si-qdot-elpa-native_omp1 .............................   Passed  112.10 sec

Is that something to worry about?

Hm, those 0.0 values do look like something to worry about...

Maybe Siesta's own ELSI (with ELPA and PEXSI) has issues on Arm (weird that only one test is failing though)

let me see if I can reproduce that on a64fx

ocaisa · 2025-03-14T09:45:52Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:aarch64/neoverse_n1

Also trying it on another architecture to see if the problem is unique to neoverse_v1

eessi-bot · 2025-03-14T09:45:56Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-aws (click for details)

received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:aarch64/neoverse_n1 from ocaisa
- expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_n1
handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_n1 resulted in:
- submitted job 50299, for details & status see {2023.06}[foss/2023a] Siesta 5.2.2, EasyBuild 5.0.0 #966 (comment)

eessi-bot · 2025-03-14T09:45:57Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-azure (click for details)

received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:aarch64/neoverse_n1 from ocaisa
- expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_n1
handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_n1 resulted in:
- no jobs were submitted

eessi-bot-trz42 · 2025-03-14T09:45:57Z

Updates by the bot instance trz42-GH200-jr (click for details)

account ocaisa has NO permission to send commands to the bot

eessi-bot-toprichard · 2025-03-14T09:45:57Z

Updates by the bot instance rt-Grace-jr (click for details)

account ocaisa has NO permission to send commands to the bot

eessi-bot · 2025-03-14T09:46:01Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture aarch64-neoverse_n1 for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/50299

date	job status	comment
Mar 14 09:46:00 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `50299` awaits release by job manager
Mar 14 09:46:57 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Mar 14 09:52:59 UTC 2025	running	job `50299` is running
Mar 14 11:13:33 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-50299.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-neoverse_n1-1741949768.tar.gz` size: 11 MiB (11565393 bytes) entries: 882 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_n1/modules/all `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a.lua` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a.lua` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.lua` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_n1/software `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCCcore-12.3.0` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0` other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_n1 no other files in tarball
Mar 14 11:13:33 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: perf: 670.283 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: perf: 664.501 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 3.49 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 3.43 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 5.23 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 5.33 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 0.46 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 0.48 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: bandwidth: 20966.82 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: bandwidth: 21261.26 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-50299.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

albgar · 2025-03-14T10:06:31Z

I can reproduce the error in the elsi-pexsi verification test if the parent test is RUN TWICE. In that case, the second run reads the DM file generated by the first run instead of starting from scratch and the subsequent data is all different.

I see that you have a categorization by 'labels'. Is it possible that the 'long' tests are run in addition to the whole battery of tests? Since the elsi-pexsi test is labelled as 'long', that would explain the second run. On the other hand, this re-use of the DM is not exclusive of the elsi-pexsi test, so I am surprised that you do not get other spurious errors in other tests that might be run twice. What exactly do you do with ctest?

ocaisa · 2025-03-14T12:00:27Z

The tests are called with
https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/blob/e535ffb8675d1388f6b3079f290d061587909cd7/easybuild/easyconfigs/s/Siesta/Siesta-5.2.2-foss-2023a.eb#L92-L94

(and a number of tests are excluded). @migueldiascosta probably knows more since he worked on the easyconfigs.

migueldiascosta · 2025-03-14T13:57:31Z

The tests are called with https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/blob/e535ffb8675d1388f6b3079f290d061587909cd7/easybuild/easyconfigs/s/Siesta/Siesta-5.2.2-foss-2023a.eb#L92-L94

(and a number of tests are excluded). @migueldiascosta probably knows more since he worked on the easyconfigs.

yeah, we're simply running, after building, export OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 && SIESTA_TESTS_VERIFY=1 ctest --output-on-failure plus excluding that list of tests, which were the ones that @AnthoniAlcaraz and I found to be small numerical deviations that could be ignored (although we can also revisit those if necessary)

@albgar what exactly did you mean by "I see that you have a categorization by 'labels'"?

albgar · 2025-03-14T14:17:26Z

The tests are called with https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/blob/e535ffb8675d1388f6b3079f290d061587909cd7/easybuild/easyconfigs/s/Siesta/Siesta-5.2.2-foss-2023a.eb#L92-L94
(and a number of tests are excluded). @migueldiascosta probably knows more since he worked on the easyconfigs.

yeah, we're simply running, after building, export OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 && SIESTA_TESTS_VERIFY=1 ctest --output-on-failure plus excluding that list of tests, which were the ones that @AnthoniAlcaraz and I found to be small numerical deviations that could be ignored (although we can also revisit those if necessary)

@albgar what exactly did you mean by "I see that you have a categorization by 'labels'"?

I thought that maybe the labels were used to run specific subsets of tests, and that some of those subsets might overlap (and thus forcing the elsi-pexsi to run twice).
But when I look at the ctest command in the easyconfig I cannot see any label use. Only the exclusion of the tests that were known to fail.
If EasyBuild admits patches, you could try adding the patch below, that will deactivate the writing and reading of the DM in the solver tests.

Alberto

diff --git a/Tests/12.Solvers/quantum-dot-base.fdf b/Tests/12.Solvers/quantum-dot-base.fdf
index b11e59652..8163aa4c5 100644
--- a/Tests/12.Solvers/quantum-dot-base.fdf
+++ b/Tests/12.Solvers/quantum-dot-base.fdf
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ use-tree-timer T
 
 WriteDMHS.NetCDF F
 WriteDM.NetCDF F
-WriteDM T
+WriteDM F
 
 SystemName          Si Quantum Dot
 SystemLabel         si-quantum-dot
@@ -42,6 +42,6 @@ MaxSCFIterations    40
 DM.MixingWeight      0.3 
 DM.NumberPulay       4  
 DM.Tolerance         1.d-3
-DM.UseSaveDM             
+DM.UseSaveDM     F
 
 ElectronicTemperature  25 meV

ocaisa · 2025-03-14T16:45:14Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:aarch64/neoverse_v1

eessi-bot · 2025-03-14T16:45:17Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-aws (click for details)

received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:aarch64/neoverse_v1 from ocaisa
- expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_v1
handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_v1 resulted in:
- submitted job 50300, for details & status see {2023.06}[foss/2023a] Siesta 5.2.2, EasyBuild 5.0.0 #966 (comment)

eessi-bot · 2025-03-14T16:45:18Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-azure (click for details)

received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:aarch64/neoverse_v1 from ocaisa
- expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_v1
handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:aarch64/neoverse_v1 resulted in:
- no jobs were submitted

eessi-bot-trz42 · 2025-03-14T16:45:18Z

Updates by the bot instance trz42-GH200-jr (click for details)

account ocaisa has NO permission to send commands to the bot

eessi-bot-toprichard · 2025-03-14T16:45:18Z

Updates by the bot instance rt-Grace-jr (click for details)

account ocaisa has NO permission to send commands to the bot

eessi-bot · 2025-03-14T16:45:22Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture aarch64-neoverse_v1 for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/50300

date	job status	comment
Mar 14 16:45:21 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `50300` awaits release by job manager
Mar 14 16:46:02 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Mar 14 16:52:05 UTC 2025	running	job `50300` is running
Mar 14 17:54:16 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-50300.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-neoverse_v1-1741973954.tar.gz` size: 12 MiB (12795975 bytes) entries: 882 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_v1/modules/all `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a.lua` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a.lua` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.lua` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_v1/software `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCCcore-12.3.0` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0` other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_v1 no other files in tarball
Mar 14 17:54:16 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: perf: 987.346 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: perf: 986.445 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 3.08 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 3.17 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 4.41 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 4.38 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 0.42 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 0.41 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: bandwidth: 33971.09 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: bandwidth: 31817.89 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-50300.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

ocaisa · 2025-03-14T16:45:57Z

I opened a patch PR at easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#22562

ocaisa · 2025-03-20T13:16:10Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:aarch64/neoverse_v1

eessi-bot · 2025-04-04T16:12:29Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-amd-zen3 for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54584

date	job status	comment
Apr 04 16:12:28 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `54584` awaits release by job manager
Apr 04 16:13:33 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Apr 04 16:24:19 UTC 2025	running	job `54584` is running
Apr 04 17:05:20 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54584.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen3-1743785818.tar.gz` size: 64 MiB (67881951 bytes) entries: 1175 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen3/modules/all `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a.lua` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a.lua` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a.lua` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.lua` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen3/software `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0` other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen3 no other files in tarball
Apr 04 17:05:20 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen3+default P: perf: 523.959 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen3+default P: perf: 535.216 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen3+default P: latency: 1.16 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen3+default P: latency: 1.1 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen3+default P: latency: 2.07 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen3+default P: latency: 2.2 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen3+default P: latency: 0.26 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen3+default P: latency: 0.25 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen3+default P: bandwidth: 13436.53 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen3+default P: bandwidth: 13367.74 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54584.out` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`
Apr 07 10:40:21 UTC 2025	uploaded	transfer of `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen3-1743785818.tar.gz` to S3 bucket succeeded

eessi-bot · 2025-04-04T16:12:35Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-intel-skylake_avx512 for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54585

date	job status	comment
Apr 04 16:12:34 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `54585` awaits release by job manager
Apr 04 16:13:43 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Apr 04 16:25:43 UTC 2025	running	job `54585` is running
Apr 04 17:10:28 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54585.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-intel-skylake_avx512-1743786063.tar.gz` size: 64 MiB (67730105 bytes) entries: 1175 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/skylake_avx512/modules/all `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a.lua` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a.lua` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a.lua` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.lua` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/skylake_avx512/software `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0` other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/skylake_avx512 no other files in tarball
Apr 04 17:10:28 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_skylake_avx512+default P: perf: 455.922 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_skylake_avx512+default P: perf: 488.855 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_skylake_avx512+default P: latency: 1.74 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_skylake_avx512+default P: latency: 3.86 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_skylake_avx512+default P: latency: 3.37 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_skylake_avx512+default P: latency: 4.12 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_skylake_avx512+default P: latency: 0.43 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_skylake_avx512+default P: latency: 0.43 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_skylake_avx512+default P: bandwidth: 10887.19 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_skylake_avx512+default P: bandwidth: 10872.11 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54585.out` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`
Apr 07 10:40:43 UTC 2025	uploaded	transfer of `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-intel-skylake_avx512-1743786063.tar.gz` to S3 bucket succeeded

eessi-bot · 2025-04-04T16:12:40Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-intel-haswell for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54586

date	job status	comment
Apr 04 16:12:39 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `54586` awaits release by job manager
Apr 04 16:13:39 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Apr 04 16:25:40 UTC 2025	running	job `54586` is running
Apr 05 20:44:43 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54586.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts No artefacts were created or found.
Apr 05 20:44:43 UTC 2025	test result	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Reason Failed for unknown reason Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54586.out` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

eessi-bot · 2025-04-04T16:12:44Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-intel-sapphirerapids for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54587

date	job status	comment
Apr 04 16:12:44 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `54587` awaits release by job manager
Apr 04 16:13:46 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Apr 04 16:27:06 UTC 2025	running	job `54587` is running
Apr 04 17:19:33 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54587.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-intel-sapphirerapids-1743786444.tar.gz` size: 64 MiB (67863372 bytes) entries: 1175 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/sapphirerapids/modules/all `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a.lua` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a.lua` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a.lua` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.lua` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/sapphirerapids/software `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0` other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/sapphirerapids no other files in tarball
Apr 04 17:19:33 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_sapphirerapids+default P: perf: 610.01 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_sapphirerapids+default P: perf: 634.894 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_sapphirerapids+default P: latency: 2.62 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_sapphirerapids+default P: latency: 1.88 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_sapphirerapids+default P: latency: 3.83 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_sapphirerapids+default P: latency: 3.94 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_sapphirerapids+default P: latency: 0.37 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_sapphirerapids+default P: latency: 0.34 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_sapphirerapids+default P: bandwidth: 13805.04 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_sapphirerapids+default P: bandwidth: 13769.95 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54587.out` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`
Apr 07 10:41:04 UTC 2025	uploaded	transfer of `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-intel-sapphirerapids-1743786444.tar.gz` to S3 bucket succeeded

eessi-bot · 2025-04-04T16:12:49Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-generic for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54588

date	job status	comment
Apr 04 16:12:48 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `54588` awaits release by job manager
Apr 04 16:13:36 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Apr 04 16:24:22 UTC 2025	running	job `54588` is running
Apr 04 17:11:43 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54588.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-generic-1743786126.tar.gz` size: 63 MiB (67056005 bytes) entries: 1175 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic/modules/all `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a.lua` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a.lua` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a.lua` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.lua` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic/software `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0` other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/generic no other files in tarball
Apr 04 17:11:43 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_generic+default P: perf: 415.114 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_generic+default P: perf: 399.415 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_generic+default P: latency: 3.13 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_generic+default P: latency: 3.17 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_generic+default P: latency: 5.82 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_generic+default P: latency: 5.81 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_generic+default P: latency: 0.73 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_generic+default P: latency: 0.74 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_generic+default P: bandwidth: 10812.21 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_generic+default P: bandwidth: 10674.43 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54588.out` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`
Apr 07 10:42:31 UTC 2025	uploaded	transfer of `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-generic-1743786126.tar.gz` to S3 bucket succeeded

eessi-bot · 2025-04-04T16:12:54Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture aarch64-generic for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54589

date	job status	comment
Apr 04 16:12:53 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `54589` awaits release by job manager
Apr 04 16:13:19 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Apr 04 16:21:50 UTC 2025	running	job `54589` is running
Apr 04 17:14:05 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54589.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-generic-1743786253.tar.gz` size: 59 MiB (62345220 bytes) entries: 1175 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/modules/all `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a.lua` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a.lua` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a.lua` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.lua` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/software `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0` other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic no other files in tarball
Apr 04 17:14:05 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_generic+default P: perf: 698.781 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_generic+default P: perf: 700.163 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64_generic+default P: latency: 3.64 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_generic+default P: latency: 3.31 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_generic+default P: latency: 5.44 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_generic+default P: latency: 5.11 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_generic+default P: latency: 0.43 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_generic+default P: latency: 0.45 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_generic+default P: bandwidth: 21040.49 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_generic+default P: bandwidth: 20370.6 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54589.out` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`
Apr 07 10:41:26 UTC 2025	uploaded	transfer of `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-generic-1743786253.tar.gz` to S3 bucket succeeded

eessi-bot · 2025-04-04T16:12:58Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture aarch64-neoverse_n1 for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54590

date	job status	comment
Apr 04 16:12:57 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `54590` awaits release by job manager
Apr 04 16:13:23 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Apr 04 16:21:54 UTC 2025	running	job `54590` is running
Apr 04 17:14:06 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54590.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-neoverse_n1-1743786245.tar.gz` size: 60 MiB (63070424 bytes) entries: 1175 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_n1/modules/all `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a.lua` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a.lua` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a.lua` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.lua` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_n1/software `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0` other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_n1 no other files in tarball
Apr 04 17:14:06 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: perf: 668.782 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: perf: 667.253 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 3.55 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 3.7 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 5.29 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 5.15 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 0.43 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: latency: 0.46 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: bandwidth: 21157.64 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_n1+default P: bandwidth: 20677.97 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54590.out` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`
Apr 07 10:41:47 UTC 2025	uploaded	transfer of `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-neoverse_n1-1743786245.tar.gz` to S3 bucket succeeded

eessi-bot · 2025-04-04T16:13:03Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture aarch64-neoverse_v1 for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54591

date	job status	comment
Apr 04 16:13:02 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `54591` awaits release by job manager
Apr 04 16:13:26 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Apr 04 16:21:57 UTC 2025	running	job `54591` is running
Apr 04 17:04:01 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54591.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-neoverse_v1-1743785712.tar.gz` size: 62 MiB (65551231 bytes) entries: 1175 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_v1/modules/all `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a.lua` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a.lua` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a.lua` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.lua` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_v1/software `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0` other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_v1 no other files in tarball
Apr 04 17:04:01 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: perf: 982.221 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: perf: 977.995 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 3.36 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 3.24 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 4.45 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 4.44 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 0.42 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: latency: 0.39 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: bandwidth: 33620.49 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_neoverse_v1+default P: bandwidth: 34330.0 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-54591.out` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`
Apr 07 10:42:09 UTC 2025	uploaded	transfer of `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-neoverse_v1-1743785712.tar.gz` to S3 bucket succeeded

ocaisa · 2025-04-07T08:41:43Z

I'm a bit lost here, for Haswell only, once I reach hybrid MPI/OpenMP tests things just hang:

Start   6: siesta-00.BasisSets-default_basis_mpi4_omp1

I'll disable UCX and libfabric and see if that helps.

ocaisa · 2025-04-07T08:57:51Z

Ok, I managed to get this to pass by setting

export FI_PROVIDER="^psm3"

This should already be in the case in the job context on our AWS build cluster but I suspect it is not being passed through when we initialise Gentoo Prefix.

ocaisa · 2025-04-07T09:00:16Z

Strange, this should have been solved by #531 but it seems not to be.

ocaisa · 2025-04-07T09:32:39Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:x86_64/intel/haswell

eessi-bot · 2025-04-07T09:32:42Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-aws (click for details)

received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:x86_64/intel/haswell from ocaisa
- expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:x86_64/intel/haswell
handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:x86_64/intel/haswell resulted in:
- submitted job 55219, for details & status see {2023.06}[foss/2023a] Siesta 5.2.2, EasyBuild 5.0.0 #966 (comment)

eessi-bot · 2025-04-07T09:32:42Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-azure (click for details)

received bot command build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:x86_64/intel/haswell from ocaisa
- expanded format: build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:x86_64/intel/haswell
handling command build repository:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws architecture:x86_64/intel/haswell resulted in:
- no jobs were submitted

eessi-bot-surf · 2025-04-07T09:32:42Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-surf (click for details)

account ocaisa has NO permission to send commands to the bot

eessi-bot-trz42 · 2025-04-07T09:32:43Z

Updates by the bot instance trz42-GH200-jr (click for details)

account ocaisa has NO permission to send commands to the bot

eessi-bot-toprichard · 2025-04-07T09:32:43Z

Updates by the bot instance rt-Grace-jr (click for details)

account ocaisa has NO permission to send commands to the bot

eessi-bot · 2025-04-07T09:32:47Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-intel-haswell for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/55219

date	job status	comment
Apr 07 09:32:46 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `55219` awaits release by job manager
Apr 07 09:33:49 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Apr 07 09:34:52 UTC 2025	running	job `55219` is running
Apr 07 10:20:54 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-55219.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-intel-haswell-1744020700.tar.gz` size: 64 MiB (67277684 bytes) entries: 1175 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/haswell/modules/all `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a.lua` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a.lua` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0.lua` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a.lua` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a.lua` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0.lua` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/haswell/software `flook/0.8.4-GCC-12.3.0` `json-fortran/9.0.2-GCC-12.3.0` `libfdf/0.5.1-GCC-12.3.0` `libGridXC/2.0.2-gompi-2023a` `libPSML/2.1.0-GCC-12.3.0` `mctc-lib/0.3.1-GCC-12.3.0` `mstore/0.3.0-GCC-12.3.0` `PnetCDF/1.12.3-gompi-2023a` `ruamel.yaml/0.17.32-GCCcore-12.3.0` `Siesta/5.2.2-foss-2023a` `Simple-DFTD3/1.2.1-gfbf-2023a` `test-drive/0.5.0-GCC-12.3.0` `TOML-Fortran/0.4.2-GCC-12.3.0` `xmlf90/1.6.3-GCC-12.3.0` other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/haswell no other files in tarball
Apr 07 10:20:54 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default P: perf: 456.023 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default P: perf: 450.067 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default P: latency: 2.99 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default P: latency: 2.91 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default P: latency: 4.42 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default P: latency: 4.34 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default P: latency: 0.82 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default P: latency: 0.78 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default P: bandwidth: 10421.66 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default P: bandwidth: 10456.69 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-55219.out` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`
Apr 07 10:42:53 UTC 2025	uploaded	transfer of `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-intel-haswell-1744020700.tar.gz` to S3 bucket succeeded

trz42

lgtm

eessi-bot-surf · 2025-04-07T10:39:37Z

Label bot:deploy has been set by user trz42, but this person does not have permission to trigger deployments

eessi-bot-toprichard · 2025-04-07T10:39:38Z

Label bot:deploy has been set by user trz42, but this person does not have permission to trigger deployments

ocaisa · 2025-04-07T18:11:20Z

@trz42 Thanks for your help with this, all staging PRs ingested and available

eessi-bot · 2025-04-07T19:22:01Z

PR merged! Moved ['/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/49709', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/50299', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/50300', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/51404', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/51405', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/51623', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/51624', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/51625', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/51626', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/51627', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/51628', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/51629', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/51630', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/52264', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/52265', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/52266', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/52267', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/52268', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/52269', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/52270', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/52271', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/52272', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54583', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54584', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54585', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54586', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54587', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54588', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54589', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54590', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/54591', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/55219'] to /project/def-users/SHARED/trash_bin/EESSI/software-layer/2025.04.07

eessi-bot · 2025-04-07T19:22:02Z

PR merged! Moved ['/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/2199', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.03/pr_966/2244', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.04/pr_966/2290'] to /project/def-users/SHARED/trash_bin/EESSI/software-layer/2025.04.07

Update eessi-2023.06-eb-4.9.4-2023a.yml

40ce5a9

Update eessi-2023.06-eb-4.9.4-2023a.yml

b61c86a

Merge branch 'EESSI:2023.06-software.eessi.io' into siesta

b442f44

ocaisa mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2025

Bot-specific SitePackage.lua that solves libfabric issues #531

Open

ocaisa added the ready-to-deploy Mark a PR as ready to deploy label Apr 7, 2025

trz42 approved these changes Apr 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

trz42 added bot:deploy Ask bot to deploy missing software installations to EESSI and removed ready-to-deploy Mark a PR as ready to deploy labels Apr 7, 2025

trz42 merged commit 87d2ae3 into EESSI:2023.06-software.eessi.io Apr 7, 2025
59 of 69 checks passed

{2023.06}[foss/2023a] Siesta 5.2.2, EasyBuild 5.0.0 #966

{2023.06}[foss/2023a] Siesta 5.2.2, EasyBuild 5.0.0 #966

Conversation

ocaisa commented Mar 10, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2025

ocaisa commented Mar 10, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2025 • edited Loading

ocaisa commented Mar 10, 2025 • edited Loading

ocaisa commented Mar 10, 2025

migueldiascosta commented Mar 10, 2025

ocaisa commented Mar 14, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot-trz42 bot commented Mar 14, 2025

eessi-bot-toprichard bot commented Mar 14, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 • edited Loading

albgar commented Mar 14, 2025

ocaisa commented Mar 14, 2025

migueldiascosta commented Mar 14, 2025

albgar commented Mar 14, 2025

ocaisa commented Mar 14, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot-trz42 bot commented Mar 14, 2025

eessi-bot-toprichard bot commented Mar 14, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 • edited Loading

ocaisa commented Mar 14, 2025

ocaisa commented Mar 20, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 • edited Loading

ocaisa commented Apr 7, 2025

ocaisa commented Apr 7, 2025

ocaisa commented Apr 7, 2025

ocaisa commented Apr 7, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2025 • edited Loading

eessi-bot-surf bot commented Apr 7, 2025

eessi-bot-trz42 bot commented Apr 7, 2025

eessi-bot-toprichard bot commented Apr 7, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2025 • edited Loading

trz42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

eessi-bot-surf bot commented Apr 7, 2025

eessi-bot-toprichard bot commented Apr 7, 2025

ocaisa commented Apr 7, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2025

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

ocaisa commented Mar 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

ocaisa commented Mar 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading