use standard limit for A64FX: only use quarter of available cores

[boegel]

No description provided.

[boegel]

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws arch:x86_64/amd/zen2

[eessi-bot-aws]

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-amd-zen2 for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.06/pr_17/70239

date	job status	comment
Jun 17 18:44:24 UTC 2025	submitted	job id 70239 awaits release by job manager
Jun 17 18:45:18 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Jun 17 18:50:30 UTC 2025	running	job 70239 is running
Jun 17 18:58:53 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file slurm-70239.out ✅ no message matching FATAL: ✅ no message matching ERROR: ✅ no message matching FAILED: ✅ no message matching required modules missing: ✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations ✅ found message matching .tar.gz created! Artefacts eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17501862780.tar.gz size: 0 MiB (17461 bytes) entries: 1 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software no software packages in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2 2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py
Jun 17 18:58:53 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: perf: 435.203 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: perf: 443.195 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 1.88 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 1.94 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 4.49 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 4.09 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 0.61 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 0.56 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: bandwidth: 7284.86 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: bandwidth: 7301.92 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file slurm-70239.out ✅ no message matching ERROR: ✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case

[trz42]

Would have probably used set_maximum, 12, but unlikely that this makes a difference for A64FX. Will it work with EB 4.9.4?