[FEATURE] 모니터링 관련 설정 추가 - #7
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 47 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughOTLP tracing과 관리 엔드포인트 설정, RabbitMQ observation, 프로파일별 로깅 구성이 추가되었습니다. 로컬 Mailpit과 프로덕션 Compose 배포가 구성되었으며, 배포 스크립트의 필수 환경변수 검증과 테스트 설정이 갱신되었습니다. Changes모니터링 및 배포 구성
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant RabbitMQ
participant RabbitConfig
participant NotificationWorker
participant OTLPCollector
RabbitMQ->>NotificationWorker: 메시지 전달
NotificationWorker->>RabbitConfig: listener factory 사용
RabbitConfig->>NotificationWorker: observation 활성화
NotificationWorker->>OTLPCollector: OTLP trace export
Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.env.example:
- Around line 13-15: Update the OTLP_TRACING_ENDPOINT example value in the
Tracing configuration to use http://localhost:4318/v1/traces, matching the
application default and local compose environment; leave OTLP_TRACING_ENABLED
unchanged.
In `@scripts/deploy.sh`:
- Line 88: Before running docker compose up in the deployment flow, remove the
existing ditda-notification-worker container created by the prior docker run
deployment, tolerating the case where it does not exist. Keep the existing
docker compose command unchanged so the Compose deployment can recreate the
container without a name conflict.
In `@src/main/resources/logback-spring.xml`:
- Around line 30-34: Update the ASYNC_JSON AsyncAppender configuration to enable
non-blocking behavior by setting neverBlock to true, while preserving the
existing queueSize and discardingThreshold settings.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: de7e72e9-f9be-4693-a3e4-32a15b50d88f
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
.env.examplebuild.gradledocker-compose.prod.yamldocker-compose.yamlscripts/deploy.shsrc/main/java/ditda/notification/config/RabbitConfig.javasrc/main/resources/application.yamlsrc/main/resources/logback-spring.xmlsrc/test/resources/application-test.yaml
🚀 Related issue
Closes #6
#️⃣ Summary
docker run→docker compose로 전환🔧 Changes
logback-spring.xml)💬 Reviewer Notes
Summary by CodeRabbit
새로운 기능
개선 사항