Skip to content

chore: keep PR title lint advisory for Dependabot - #12

Merged
DevVig merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/pr-title-soft-required
Jul 17, 2026
Merged

chore: keep PR title lint advisory for Dependabot#12
DevVig merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/pr-title-soft-required

Conversation

@DevVig

@DevVig DevVig commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • PR title conventional-commit check stays on, but is not a required ruleset check (avoids Dependabot lockouts)
  • Ignore dependencies / dependabot labels

Test plan

  • CI green
  • Squash-merge

Made with Cursor

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 17, 2026 18:10
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 55 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a6bc0c26-1af3-4929-a75f-8348f5398dd0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6511683 and ec44498.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/pr-title.yml
  • docs/governance.md

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@DevVig
DevVig merged commit 40fbb57 into main Jul 17, 2026
5 of 7 checks passed
@DevVig
DevVig deleted the chore/pr-title-soft-required branch July 17, 2026 18:11

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the PR-title conventional-commit linting to better accommodate Dependabot updates and documents the branch protection posture in governance docs.

Changes:

  • Adjusts the PR title workflow trigger and adds label-based exclusions for dependency PRs.
  • Updates governance documentation to note PR title linting as advisory alongside required status checks.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
docs/governance.md Updates branch protection documentation to reflect PR title lint being advisory.
.github/workflows/pr-title.yml Changes PR title lint trigger and ignores dependencies/dependabot labeled PRs.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines 3 to 5
on:
pull_request_target:
pull_request:
types: [opened, edited, synchronize, reopened]
Comment thread docs/governance.md
Comment on lines +14 to 17
| Status checks | `rust (ubuntu-latest)`, `rust (macos-latest)`, `ui` (strict); PR title lint is CI advisory |
| Conversations | Must be resolved |
| Approvals | 0 required (solo-friendly); stale reviews dismissed |
| Admin bypass | Via pull request only |
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants