Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(llmobs): ragas evaluation framework integration #11939

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lievan
Copy link
Contributor

@lievan lievan commented Jan 14, 2025

Publicize the RAGAS integration

RAGAS is an evaluation framework for RAG Applications. The integration supports evaluating LLM inferences with three RAGAS metrics

  • faithfulness
  • answer relevancy
  • context precision

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

Copy link
Contributor

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

releasenotes/notes/ragas-integration-a81b696757c0e7a5.yaml              @DataDog/apm-python
ddtrace/llmobs/_evaluators/runner.py                                    @DataDog/ml-observability
ddtrace/llmobs/_evaluators/sampler.py                                   @DataDog/ml-observability
tests/llmobs/test_llmobs_evaluator_runner.py                            @DataDog/ml-observability
tests/llmobs/test_llmobs_ragas_evaluators.py                            @DataDog/ml-observability
tests/llmobs/test_llmobs_service.py                                     @DataDog/ml-observability

@lievan lievan changed the title feat(llmobs): integration with the ragas evaluation framework feat(llmobs): ragas evaluation framework integration Jan 14, 2025
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: evan.li/release-ragas
Commit report: f642a1c
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 130 Passed, 1468 Skipped, 4m 46.34s Total duration (29m 10.85s time saved)

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-01-21 21:10:20

Comparing candidate commit 5415c24 in PR branch evan.li/release-ragas with baseline commit 0003501 in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 394 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

@lievan lievan marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2025 18:19
@lievan lievan requested review from a team as code owners January 17, 2025 18:19
Copy link
Contributor

@sabrenner sabrenner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

sampling_rules_str = os.getenv(self.SAMPLING_RULES_ENV_VAR)
telemetry_writer.add_configuration("_DD_LLMOBS_EVALUATOR_SAMPLING_RULES", sampling_rules_str, origin="env")

deprecated_sampling_rules_str = os.getenv(self.DEPRECATED_SAMPLING_RULES_ENV_VAR)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For these variables we have a declared constant, but for _DD_LLMOBS_EVALUATORS we use the string name directly. Should we make it more consistent?

---
features:
- |
LLM Observability: This introduces an integration with the [RAGAS](https://docs.ragas.io/en/stable/) evaluation framework to continuously monitor
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The release notes are not Markdown, they are reStructuredText. See e.g. here for an example of the link syntax.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants