[DRAFT] Sync opcodes list with FTEQCC DP newest target opcodes. #280
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
NOTE: consider this PR a draft until #279 and https://github.com/fte-team/fteqw/pull/369/files are merged. |
divVerent
force-pushed
the
divVerent/new-opcodes-list
branch
2 times, most recently
from
83120aa to
b3b4327
Compare
divVerent
changed the title
Writing to OFS_NULL is highly dangerous and will e.g. break STOREP instructions by interpreting the OFS_NULL value as an array offset when no array offset is intended.
LOADP/STOREP/GLOBALADDRESS fully replace it, and GADDRESS was always pretty much broken.
It already is being refused by the progs loader for how broken it is - now let's delete its implementation too.
Allows to easier check that the opcodes lists match.
divVerent
force-pushed
the
divVerent/new-opcodes-list
branch
from
b3b4327 to
4f2ccd3
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note: this is relative to #279.
This should not affect the engine at all, but is easier to compare to FTEQCC.