Skip to content

Conversation

@neofight78
Copy link
Contributor

@neofight78 neofight78 commented May 7, 2025

Resolves issue #39

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added support for displaying multiple principal variation (MultiPV) lines in engine analysis, allowing users to see several alternative move sequences.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved handling of engine output to ensure robust parsing and accurate assignment of main and alternative lines.
  • Tests
    • Introduced new tests to verify correct extraction and display of MultiPV information from engine analysis.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce support for handling multiple principal variations (MultiPV) in the chess engine's UCI interface. This includes updating data structures to store multiple info lines, modifying response processing to accommodate MultiPV, ensuring proper initialization, and adding tests to verify MultiPV functionality.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
uci/info.go Added MultiPVInfo []Info field to the SearchResults struct to store multiple principal variations.
uci/cmd.go Updated ProcessResponse in CmdGo to parse and assign multiple PV info lines to SearchResults.MultiPVInfo.
uci/engine.go Modified Engine initialization in New to ensure results.MultiPVInfo is a non-nil empty slice.
uci/engine_test.go Added Test_EngineInfo and Test_EngineMultiPVInfo to validate primary and MultiPV info extraction.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Function
    participant Engine as UCI Engine
    participant Stockfish as Stockfish Engine

    Test->>Engine: Create new Engine (with MultiPVInfo initialized)
    Test->>Engine: Set option multipv=3
    Test->>Engine: Send position (FEN)
    Test->>Engine: Go movetime 100
    Engine->>Stockfish: Send UCI commands
    Stockfish-->>Engine: Responds with multiple info lines (MultiPV)
    Engine->>Engine: Parse info lines, populate MultiPVInfo
    Test->>Engine: Retrieve SearchResults
    Test->>Test: Assert MultiPVInfo contents
Loading

Poem

In the warren, lines abound,
MultiPV treasures newly found!
Each move a hop, a leap, a bound—
Info gathered all around.
With tests to check and fields anew,
The engine’s mind now splits in two (or three! 🐇).
Chess is richer—thanks to you!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
uci/cmd.go (1)

329-337: Consider defining a constant for the magic number

The code uses a magic number 300 as an upper bound for valid MultiPV indices. Consider defining this as a named constant for better code readability and maintenance.

+// MaxMultiPV defines the maximum number of principal variations we'll process
+const MaxMultiPV = 300
 
-		if info.Multipv > 1 && info.Multipv < 300 {
+		if info.Multipv > 1 && info.Multipv < MaxMultiPV {
uci/engine_test.go (2)

26-53: Test_EngineInfo: Document why the test is skipped

This test verifies that the primary principal variation is correctly populated but is currently skipped with t.SkipNow(). Consider adding a comment explaining why the test is skipped (e.g., requires Stockfish installation, long-running test, etc.) or remove the skip if it's ready to be run in CI.

func Test_EngineInfo(t *testing.T) {
+	// TODO: This test is skipped because it requires Stockfish to be installed
+	// at the specified path. Remove this skip when running tests locally with Stockfish.
	t.SkipNow()

55-99: Test_EngineMultiPVInfo: Comprehensive verification of multiple PV lines

This test thoroughly verifies that all three expected MultiPV lines are populated correctly, checking both the count and the specific first move of each line. Consider documenting why the test is skipped, similar to the previous test.

func Test_EngineMultiPVInfo(t *testing.T) {
+	// TODO: This test is skipped because it requires Stockfish to be installed
+	// at the specified path. Remove this skip when running tests locally with Stockfish.
	t.SkipNow()
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1589093 and ebcc4c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • uci/cmd.go (2 hunks)
  • uci/engine.go (1 hunks)
  • uci/engine_test.go (1 hunks)
  • uci/info.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
uci/info.go (1)
move.go (1)
  • Move (25-37)
uci/cmd.go (1)
uci/info.go (2)
  • SearchResults (16-21)
  • Info (89-103)
uci/engine.go (2)
uci/cmd.go (2)
  • CmdPosition (157-160)
  • CmdPosition (178-180)
uci/info.go (2)
  • SearchResults (16-21)
  • Info (89-103)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: vulncheck
🔇 Additional comments (10)
uci/info.go (1)

17-20: Well-structured addition of MultiPV support

The addition of MultiPVInfo []Info field to the SearchResults struct is a clean implementation for storing multiple principal variations. This complements the existing fields like BestMove, Ponder, and Info while maintaining backward compatibility.

uci/engine.go (1)

55-55: Proper initialization of MultiPVInfo slice

Good practice to initialize the MultiPVInfo field as an empty slice when creating a new Engine instance. This ensures the slice is never nil, preventing potential nil pointer dereference errors later in the code.

uci/cmd.go (5)

290-290: Good initialization of MultiPVInfo slice with capacity

Initializing the MultiPVInfo slice with an initial capacity of 1 is a good approach to prepare for storing multiple PV lines while ensuring the slice is never nil.


321-323: Improved error handling for more robust parsing

Continuing on unmarshaling errors rather than returning them makes the processing more resilient against malformed input lines from the engine.


325-327: Clear handling of primary principal variation

This code appropriately handles the primary principal variation (Multipv 0 or 1) by assigning it to the main Info field, maintaining backward compatibility.


331-335: Efficient slice expansion for multiple PV lines

This code efficiently expands the slice only when necessary to accommodate higher MultiPV indices, avoiding unnecessary allocations.


339-339: Ensuring consistency between Info and MultiPVInfo

Setting the first element of MultiPVInfo to match results.Info ensures consistency between the primary PV in both data structures, which is a good practice.

uci/engine_test.go (3)

40-42: Well-structured test configuration for MultiPV

Good test setup that explicitly configures the engine for MultiPV mode with 3 lines, sets a position, and runs a search with a reasonable time limit.


76-80: Good validation of MultiPV line count

The test correctly verifies that exactly 3 MultiPV lines are returned, matching the configuration set with the "multipv" option.


82-98: Thorough verification of each principal variation

Excellent test coverage that verifies the expected first move for each of the 3 principal variations. This ensures that the MultiPV parsing and storage work correctly.

@CorentinGS CorentinGS merged commit 7b06df2 into CorentinGS:main May 9, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants