Create simulator-tests.yml Workflow for simulator tests #378
Conversation
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow titled "Runs All Simulator tests" has been established. This workflow triggers on pushes and pull requests to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant GitHub Actions
participant Node.js
participant Simulator Tests
Developer->>GitHub Actions: Push or Pull Request to main
GitHub Actions->>Node.js: Set up Node.js 20.x
GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Check out code
GitHub Actions->>Node.js: Install dependencies (npm ci)
GitHub Actions->>Simulator Tests: Run tests (npm run test)
Simulator Tests-->>GitHub Actions: Return test results
GitHub Actions-->>Developer: Notify results
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/simulator-tests.yml (1)
9-17: Consider renaming the job to "test".The job name "build" is not very descriptive for a job that runs tests. A more appropriate name would be "test".
Apply this diff to rename the job:
jobs: - build: + test: runs-on: ubuntu-latest
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/simulator-tests.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/simulator-tests.yml (4)
1-7: LGTM!The workflow name and trigger events are appropriate for running simulator tests.
18-24: LGTM!The checkout and Node.js setup steps are correctly configured.
26-27: LGTM!Using
npm ciis the recommended way to install dependencies in CI environments.
28-29: Verify thetestscript.Ensure that the
testscript is defined inpackage.jsonand runs the simulator tests.Run the following script to verify the
testscript:If the
testscript is not defined or does not run the simulator tests, I can help you update the script. Let me know if you would like me to suggest the changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/simulator-tests.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/simulator-tests.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/simulator-tests.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/simulator-tests.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (10)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/bitConvertor.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/combinationalAnalysis.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/complexCircuit.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/data.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/decoders-plexers.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/gates.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/misc.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/sequential.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/subCircuit.spec.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (13)
package.json (1)
36-36: Approved addition ofresize-observer-polyfill.The addition of
resize-observer-polyfillversion^1.5.1is approved as it enhances cross-browser compatibility for resize events. Ensure to verify the compatibility of this new dependency with existing ones to avoid potential conflicts.src/simulator/spec/subCircuit.spec.js (1)
13-15: Approved import and global assignment ofResizeObserver.The import of
ResizeObserverfromresize-observer-polyfilland its assignment to the global scope are approved. Ensure to verify that this global modification does not interfere with existing global properties or lead to unexpected behavior.Verification successful
Global
ResizeObserverAssignment VerifiedThe global assignment of
ResizeObserveris consistently used across multiple test files and is isolated to the testing environment. This ensures it does not interfere with the application runtime or existing global properties. The behavior ofResizeObserveris likely tested within these files, confirming its expected functionality.
- Files with global
ResizeObserverassignment:
src/simulator/spec/subCircuit.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/misc.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/decoders-plexers.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/gates.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/bitConvertor.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/complexCircuit.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/data.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/sequential.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/combinationalAnalysis.spec.jsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of global `ResizeObserver` on the application. # Test: Search for any issues reported in test logs or runtime errors related to `ResizeObserver`. echo "Check test logs and runtime errors for any issues related to the global 'ResizeObserver'."Length of output: 194
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to `ResizeObserver` in the codebase to check for potential conflicts. rg 'ResizeObserver' --context 5 # Search for test cases related to `ResizeObserver` to ensure its behavior is tested. rg 'ResizeObserver' --glob '*.{spec,test}.*' --context 5Length of output: 17136
src/simulator/spec/bitConvertor.spec.js (1)
10-12: Approved import and global assignment ofResizeObserver.The import of
ResizeObserverfromresize-observer-polyfilland its assignment to the global scope are approved. Ensure to verify the consistency and absence of side effects across different test files.Verification successful
Consistent Global Assignment of
ResizeObserverAcross Test FilesThe
ResizeObserveris consistently imported and assigned to the global scope across multiple test files. This pattern appears intentional to ensure each test suite has its own setup, minimizing side effects. Ensure this approach is documented to maintain clarity and prevent future issues.
- Files with global
ResizeObserverassignment:
src/simulator/spec/combinationalAnalysis.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/gates.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/subCircuit.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/decoders-plexers.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/sequential.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/data.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/complexCircuit.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/bitConvertor.spec.jssrc/simulator/spec/misc.spec.jsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency and absence of side effects of global `ResizeObserver` across different test files. # Test: Search for any inconsistencies or side effects in test files related to `ResizeObserver`. echo "Check for any inconsistencies or side effects in test files related to the global 'ResizeObserver'."Length of output: 214
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for occurrences of 'ResizeObserver' in test files to check for inconsistencies or side effects. rg 'ResizeObserver' --glob '**/*.{spec,test}.*' -A 5Length of output: 4858
src/simulator/spec/combinationalAnalysis.spec.js (2)
12-12: Approved: Import ofResizeObserverfrom polyfill.The import statement correctly includes
ResizeObserverfromresize-observer-polyfill, ensuring compatibility across environments where this feature may not be natively supported.
14-14: Approved with caution: Assignment ofResizeObserverto global scope.Assigning
ResizeObserverto the global scope ensures it is available throughout the testing environment. However, be cautious with modifications to the global scope as they can lead to side effects that affect other tests or components.src/simulator/spec/complexCircuit.spec.js (2)
15-15: Approved: Import ofResizeObserverfrom polyfill.Consistent with other test files, the import of
ResizeObserverfromresize-observer-polyfillensures compatibility and functionality across different testing environments.
17-17: Approved with caution: Assignment ofResizeObserverto global scope.This assignment ensures that
ResizeObserveris available throughout the testing environment. As with other similar modifications, caution is advised to prevent unintended side effects that could affect other tests.src/simulator/spec/sequential.spec.js (2)
13-13: Approved: Import ofResizeObserverfrom polyfill.The import statement is correctly implemented and consistent across the testing suite, ensuring that
ResizeObserveris available in environments where it might not be natively supported.
15-15: Approved with caution: Assignment ofResizeObserverto global scope.This assignment is consistent with other test files and ensures that
ResizeObserveris available throughout the testing environment. Caution is advised to manage potential side effects.src/simulator/spec/gates.spec.js (1)
13-15: Addition of ResizeObserver to the global scopeThe import and assignment of
ResizeObserverto the global scope are correctly implemented. However, it's important to ensure that this addition does not interfere with existing properties on the global object or cause unexpected side effects in other parts of the application.Consider adding a check to ensure
ResizeObserveris not already defined on the global object before assignment to avoid potential conflicts:+ if (!global.ResizeObserver) { + global.ResizeObserver = ResizeObserver; + }src/simulator/spec/decoders-plexers.spec.js (1)
13-15: Consistent handling of ResizeObserver across test filesThe addition of
ResizeObserverto the global scope is replicated here as in the gates.spec.js file. Ensure that this pattern is consistently applied across all test files to avoid discrepancies in test environments.As with the previous file, consider checking if
ResizeObserveris already defined on the global object to prevent overwriting:+ if (!global.ResizeObserver) { + global.ResizeObserver = ResizeObserver; + }src/simulator/spec/misc.spec.js (1)
13-15: Uniform handling of ResizeObserver in test filesThe import and assignment of
ResizeObserverto the global scope are consistent with the other test files. This uniformity is good for maintaining a consistent test environment across different modules.To prevent potential conflicts with other global properties, it's advisable to check if
ResizeObserveris already defined on the global object:+ if (!global.ResizeObserver) { + global.ResizeObserver = ResizeObserver; + }src/simulator/spec/data.spec.js (1)
25-25: Import of ResizeObserverThe import of
ResizeObserverfromresize-observer-polyfillis correctly implemented. This ensures that the functionality is available in environments where it may not be natively supported.
| @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ import { createRouter, createWebHistory } from 'vue-router'; | |||
| import i18n from '#/locales/i18n'; | |||
| import vuetify from '#/plugins/vuetify'; | |||
| import { routes } from '#/router'; | |||
| import ResizeObserver from 'resize-observer-polyfill'; | |||
|
|
|||
| global.ResizeObserver = ResizeObserver; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Assignment to global.ResizeObserver
Assigning the imported ResizeObserver to global.ResizeObserver effectively makes it available globally. This is a common practice for polyfills to ensure compatibility across different environments. However, modifying the global object can have side effects if not handled carefully.
Consider adding a check to ensure that global.ResizeObserver is not already defined before assigning it to avoid potential conflicts:
+ if (!global.ResizeObserver) {
+ global.ResizeObserver = ResizeObserver;
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| global.ResizeObserver = ResizeObserver; | |
| if (!global.ResizeObserver) { | |
| global.ResizeObserver = ResizeObserver; | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@niladrix719 Why are we always relying on polyfill even if the feature available on the browser ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ | |||
| "interactjs": "^1.10.17", | |||
| "jquery": "^3.6.0", | |||
| "pinia": "^2.0.14", | |||
| "resize-observer-polyfill": "^1.5.1", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
https://caniuse.com/resizeobserver It is already available on 95% of the browsers, I don't think we should be using this polyfill unless necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It was working fine locally without any polyfill, but it was failing in the GitHub workflow
https://github.com/CircuitVerse/cv-frontend-vue/actions/runs/10736591287/job/29776330239
Co-authored-by: Aboobacker MK <[email protected]>
|
@niladrix719 resolve the unresolved conversations |
Summary by CodeRabbit
ResizeObserver, ensuring tests involving responsive design function correctly.