Conversation
4536317 to
151a97c
Compare
|
There is a WIP for node 13 support: kwhitley/apicache#212 We can also use another cache middleware, that is widely used. |
|
@Chocobozzz would using the branch/commit in the PR you linked be an acceptable temp workwround? |
@Chocobozzz I'm afraid the maintainer of Of note, Redis support was not the primary target of If we are aiming for proper reactivity/support, I'm not sure |
|
I'm waiting for the merge of kwhitley/apicache#228 |
|
Ah great! I hadn't seen it. |
apicache seems loosely maintained, especially regarding the support for nodejs 13 & 14. Hopefully, someone took care of the package and published it as apicache-plus, retaining retro-compatibility and adding the lacking engine support.
fixes #2700