Skip to content

Add Chainspect and Artemis analytics for Algorand - #2029

Merged
eugene17kotov merged 5 commits into
Chain-Love:mainfrom
ZuryVill:add-chainspect-artemis-algorand
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

Add Chainspect and Artemis analytics for Algorand#2029
eugene17kotov merged 5 commits into
Chain-Love:mainfrom
ZuryVill:add-chainspect-artemis-algorand

Conversation

@ZuryVill

@ZuryVill ZuryVill commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • add Chainspect as an active blockchain analytics provider and canonical free analytics offer
  • add Chainspect dashboards for Algorand, Arbitrum, Ethereum, and Somnia, covering scalability, decentralization, developer, and financial metrics
  • add the existing Artemis analytics offer to Algorand using its chain-specific dashboard

Sources

Validation

  • all added URLs return HTTP 200
  • CSV column counts and slugs validated locally
  • touched rows are A-Z sorted
  • git diff --check passes

Rewards

0x7a1689d1e167ba9e992493be0bcbf05a8dc26c9d (Ethereum Mainnet)

@USS-Supervisor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi @ZuryVill - this PR is stale, and review should wait until required CI is passing. Current status: no checks are currently reported on the add-chainspect-artemis-algorand branch. Could you please fix or trigger CI and update the PR when ready?

@ZuryVill
ZuryVill force-pushed the add-chainspect-artemis-algorand branch from e5ac8d6 to cf6eca1 Compare July 22, 2026 00:58
@ZuryVill

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Rebased this PR cleanly onto current main, resolved the conflict, and added the official Chainspect provider logo plus logoPath. Required JSON validation passes on head cf6eca1. The remaining link-check is skipped because contributors cannot manage the upstream check-links label. Could a maintainer please add the label and authorize the link-check run?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Status Count
🔍 Total 9
🔗 Unique 9
✅ Successful 9
⏳ Timeouts 0
🔀 Redirected 0
👻 Excluded 0
❓ Unknown 0
🚫 Errors 0
⛔ Unsupported 0

Full Github Actions output

USS-Supervisor
USS-Supervisor previously approved these changes Jul 22, 2026

@USS-Supervisor USS-Supervisor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Verdict: APPROVE
Risk: LOW
Summary: The analytics additions keep canonical offer references coherent, add the needed Chainspect provider/logo data, preserve existing CSV shape, and both required CI plus the current-cycle link-check are green.
Findings: None.
Confidence: HIGH

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Status Count
🔍 Total 24
🔗 Unique 24
✅ Successful 24
⏳ Timeouts 0
🔀 Redirected 1
👻 Excluded 0
❓ Unknown 0
🚫 Errors 0
⛔ Unsupported 0

Full Github Actions output

@USS-Supervisor USS-Supervisor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Verdict: APPROVE
Risk: LOW
Summary: The Chainspect provider/offer additions and network listings are structurally consistent, the Artemis dashboard/provider updates keep canonical references intact, the new provider logo is a valid PNG, and current-head validation plus link-check are green.
Findings: None.
Confidence: HIGH

@eugene17kotov
eugene17kotov merged commit f33d538 into Chain-Love:main Jul 24, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants