Add OpenZeppelin, Safe, and other security offers to all-networks

[dacdoyx]

Adds 23 missing security offers to listings/all-networks/security.csv

Wallet: 0xde524fddf721fe3376916deff77b7e9f3593b4e9 (Ethereum)

[USS-Supervisor]

Hi @dacdoyx - this PR has been inactive for more than 3 days, and required CI has not reported on the branch yet. Review should wait until required CI is green. Could you please trigger or fix CI and update the PR?

[USS-Supervisor]

Hi @eugene17kotov - this stale PR looks ready for reviewer action: required CI is passing and I do not see a current creator-side blocker. I requested your review so it can keep moving. Could you please take a look when you have a chance?

[USS-Supervisor]

Hi @dacdoyx, this PR is stale and review should wait because no CI checks are currently reported for the branch. Could you please update the PR so required validation runs and passes?

[USS-Supervisor]

Hi @dacdoyx - closing this stale PR for now because no checks are currently reported on the add-security-openzeppelin-safe branch. The next step after my previous supervisor ping was on the PR creator side, and the PR stayed unattended for more than 7 full days with no meaningful update. Please feel free to reopen or recreate it once CI can run and pass.

[eugene17kotov]

@dacdoyx
Thanks for the contribution.

Only the following offer is suitable for listings/all-networks/security.csv because it is network-independent:

• salus-penetration-testing

The following offers have network-, runtime-, or chain-specific coverage and should be moved to the relevant specific-network listings:

• abdk
• aegis-web3
• audit-base-pay-as-you-go
• audit-base-pro
• audit-base-starter
• audit-base-team
• beosin-kyt
• beosin-smart-contract-audit
• beosin-trace
• blockaid
• blocksec-phalcon
• chainsecurity
• openzeppelin-audits
• salus-audit
• salus-zk-solution
• sec3-x-ray-build
• sec3-x-ray-enterprise
• sec3-x-ray-essential
• sec3-x-ray-scale
• ziion-linux-distro

Additionally:

• polyzoa does not have sufficient official evidence for universal network support.
• safe does not primarily fit the security category.

[github-actions]

Summary

Status	Count
🔍 Total	0
🔗 Unique	0
✅ Successful	0
⏳ Timeouts	0
🔀 Redirected	0
👻 Excluded	0
❓ Unknown	0
🚫 Errors	0
⛔ Unsupported	0

Full Github Actions output

[github-actions]

Summary

Status	Count
🔍 Total	0
🔗 Unique	0
✅ Successful	0
⏳ Timeouts	0
🔀 Redirected	0
👻 Excluded	0
❓ Unknown	0
🚫 Errors	0
⛔ Unsupported	0

Full Github Actions output

[USS-Supervisor]

Verdict: APPROVE
Risk: LOW
Summary: Current diff is narrow: it moves the existing salus-penetration-testing security listing into listings/all-networks/security.csv and removes the now-duplicative specific-network rows. The canonical offer resolves to the existing Salus provider, touched CSVs parse with stable 16-column shape, no duplicate listing slugs were introduced, and no specific-network salus-penetration-testing rows remain after the move. Required validation is green on head 793ca66dde20a474c37ecbadde8d2e35133b5c5b; I refreshed check-links for this review cycle and run 29998313795 completed successfully with 0 link errors/timeouts.
Findings: None.
Confidence: HIGH