Create CODEOWNERS

[naheel0]

🚀 BΞYTΞFLʘW | Pull Request Protocol

PR Type: (Choose one: feat | fix | refactor | docs | perf)
Issue Link: Fixes #

---

📝 System Summary

Provide a concise brief of the changes introduced to the stream.

🛠️ Technical Changes

• Logic change in ...
• New UI component added: ...
• Database schema updated: ...

🧪 Quality Assurance (QA)

• Linting: Code style matches the BeyteFlow grid.
• Build: npm run build executed without errors.
• Testing: New logic has been verified and tested.
• Dark Mode: UI is high-contrast and neon-optimized.

🖼️ Visual Evidence

If this PR affects the UI, drop a screenshot or GIF below:

---

📡 Developer Authorization

• I have performed a self-review of my code.
• My changes generate no new warnings in the console.
• I have updated the documentation (if applicable).

Authorized by: @Yourusername
Timestamp: {{ date }}

---

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the repository's code ownership configuration to establish designated maintainers for code review and oversight across the repository.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request adds a single CODEOWNERS entry to the repository's GitHub configuration, assigning two code owners to all paths within the project for governance and review purposes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Configuration .github/CODEOWNERS	Adds code owner assignments to all repository paths.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Poem

🐰 Hop hop, a CODEOWNERS line so fine,
Two guardians stand in code's design,
With watchful eyes on every file,
They'll keep the warren's work worthwhile! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Create CODEOWNERS' directly and clearly describes the main change—adding a CODEOWNERS file to the repository.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch naheel0-patch-1

---

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

🧹 Recent nitpick comments

.github/CODEOWNERS (1)

1-1: LGTM! Valid CODEOWNERS configuration.

The syntax is correct and the wildcard pattern is appropriate for initial repository setup.

As the project grows, consider these optional refinements:

• Granular ownership patterns: Define specific paths for different areas (e.g., /.github/ @naheel0, `/docs/ `@adithyanmkd) to distribute review load
• Inline documentation: Add comments explaining ownership responsibilities

📝 Example of more granular ownership (optional future enhancement)

+# Default owners for everything in the repo
 * `@naheel0` `@adithyanmkd`
+
+# Documentation
+/docs/ `@adithyanmkd`
+
+# GitHub workflows and configuration
+/.github/ `@naheel0`

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}