Skip to content

ci: batch dacs official builds - #66

Merged
jmclong (jmclong) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/jlong/batch-dacs-official
Sep 14, 2026
Merged

jmclong (jmclong) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/jlong/batch-dacs-official

Conversation

@jmclong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

This pull request makes a minor update to the pipeline configuration by enabling batch processing for triggers in the .pipelines/dacs-official.yml file. This means that builds will be batched when multiple changes are pushed in quick succession, helping to optimize CI/CD resource usage.

Validation

Small PR to change dacs-official, validation isn't possible before merging in.

Related issue

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

No unresolved review issues were identified.

Pull request overview

Enables batching for official DACS CI builds to reduce redundant builds during rapid pushes.

Changes:

  • Adds batch: true to the main branch trigger.
File summaries
File Description
.pipelines/dacs-official.yml Enables batching for CI triggers.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@jmclong
jmclong (jmclong) merged commit e8d30e3 into main Sep 14, 2026
41 checks passed
@jmclong
jmclong (jmclong) deleted the dev/jlong/batch-dacs-official branch September 22, 2026 11:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants