Add OpenAcme — AI Workforce Platform (external) to Advanced Agents#232
Add OpenAcme — AI Workforce Platform (external) to Advanced Agents#232sandydasari wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe README’s Advanced Agents section now shows 25 projects and includes a new entry for OpenAcme — AI Workforce Platform with its link and descriptive text. ChangesREADME Update
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)
314-314: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winUpdate project count from 24 to 25.
The Advanced Agents section now contains 25 projects after adding OpenAcme, but the header still states "24 projects".
- **Complex multi-agent pipelines for production-ready end-to-end workflows.** _24 projects_ + **Complex multi-agent pipelines for production-ready end-to-end workflows.** _25 projects_🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@README.md` at line 314, The Advanced Agents section header is stale and still says 24 projects even though OpenAcme brings the total to 25. Update the project count text in the README header that describes the Advanced Agents section so it reflects the current total of 25 projects.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Outside diff comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 314: The Advanced Agents section header is stale and still says 24
projects even though OpenAcme brings the total to 25. Update the project count
text in the README header that describes the Advanced Agents section so it
reflects the current total of 25 projects.
shivaylamba
left a comment
shivaylamba
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
need to use actual code in the project with nebius token factory :)))
3 participants
🔗 Linked Issue
N/A — single external-link README entry
✅ Type of Change
📝 Summary
Adds OpenAcme as a single entry under 🔬 Advanced Agents in the README.
OpenAcme is an open-source AI workforce platform: named, role-specialized agents that each own their own tools, memory, MCP servers, tasks, and workspace, and that delegate tasks to one another. Local-first, bring-your-own-model (multi-provider LLM), no telemetry. Web + CLI UI. It fits "complex multi-agent pipelines" — it ships a dispatcher, per-agent task queues, and cross-agent task assignment.
This is added as an external link (marked
↗ external) pointing to the maintained project repo, rather than a vendored project folder, since OpenAcme is a standalone TypeScript platform rather than a single Python example app.📖 README Checklist
README.mdfile for my project. (N/A — external link)README.mdfollows the official.github/README_TEMPLATE.md. (N/A)README.md. (in the linked repo)assetsfolder. (N/A)✔️ Contributor Checklist
requirements.txtorpyproject.toml. (N/A).env.examplefile. (N/A)💬 Additional Comments
Existing README entries point to in-repo project folders; this is an external reference, so I've marked it
↗ externaland left the project-folder checklist items as N/A. Glad to instead open a tracking issue first, vendor a minimal runnable example, or adjust the section/wording — whatever you prefer.Summary by CodeRabbit