-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modified packages list updates #578
Conversation
| kernel-srpm-macros | Doesn't require modification | Doesn't require modification | <b>Git commit:</b><br>[Kitten 10](https://git.almalinux.org/rpms/kernel-srpm-macros/commit/715df6d24127c2236e7e8843ce921f6afa36970a) | - Add x86_64_v2 support | | ||
| ocaml-srpm-macros | Doesn't require modification | Doesn't require modification | <b>Git commit:</b><br>[Kitten 10](https://git.almalinux.org/rpms/ocaml-srpm-macros/commit/eb225ffe9653d50b3a170702131d514daf42f126) | - Add x86_64_v2 support | | ||
| openblas-srpm-macros | Doesn't require modification | Doesn't require modification | <b>Git commit:</b><br>[Kitten 10](https://git.almalinux.org/rpms/openblas-srpm-macros/commit/801eaf0481bae0fe5fd415aa62f1bf1462e5d645) | - Add x86_64_v2 support | | ||
| perl-AnyEvent | <b>Git commit:</b><br>[8](https://git.almalinux.org/rpms/perl-AnyEvent/commit/7df8a744d97fbb6b31ace8f6bef17177bae18d37) | Doesn't require modification | Doesn't require modification | - Use patch for fix ssltest| | ||
| rpm-ostree | <b>Git commit:</b><br>[8](https://git.almalinux.org/rpms/rpm-ostree/commit/bf2f06b445140c9786e1fe50301a734e6094b77c) |Doesn't require modification | Doesn't require modification | - Add libassuan-devel to BR| |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the latest AlmaLinux 8 rpm-ostree package is no longer modified.
https://build.almalinux.org/build/9848
imports/c8/rpm-ostree-2022.10.117.g52714b51-3.el8_9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it’s been moved to the end of the page, to the List of modified packages that no longer require debranding
section.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pastalian that is true that's why in this pr the package is to be moved to the table of packages that do need require debranding anymore
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah, sorry. I missed that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not a problem at all! thank you for double checking :)
No description provided.