Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add Nginx support #22

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anurag-rajawat
Copy link
Contributor

@anurag-rajawat anurag-rajawat commented Oct 12, 2024

Description

This PR

  • Adds nginx njs script to observe API calls.
  • Adds support for Nginx Inc ingress controller.
  • Adds support to observe API calls made to an application backed by nginx web server on a VM.

Additional information for reviewers

Docs are in #24

@anurag-rajawat anurag-rajawat marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 09:30
@anurag-rajawat anurag-rajawat changed the title feat: Add Nginx njs script feat: Add Nginx support Oct 23, 2024
@anurag-rajawat anurag-rajawat added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 23, 2024
@anurag-rajawat anurag-rajawat self-assigned this Oct 25, 2024
@nandhued nandhued linked an issue Nov 4, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@PrimalPimmy PrimalPimmy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some questions

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so we are commenting both configs (istio sidecar and njs) and letting the users decide? Would it be better to use just two separate config files for each of these? Or make it configurable elsewhere?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be better to use just two separate config files for each of these? Or make it configurable elsewhere?

If we have n integration sources, we'll need to maintain config files for each of those n sources. That's why we have chosen to use a slice for the receivers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: 👀 In review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

North/South Traffic API monitoring
2 participants