fix(protocol): correct build_recipient doc comment advice map signature

[giwaov]

Summary

Remove the incorrect advice map input declaration from the build_recipient procedure's doc comment.

Problem

The doc comment for build_recipient in note.masm declared STORAGE_COMMITMENT: [INPUTS] as a required advice map input. However, the procedure computes the storage commitment internally via compute_storage_commitment and inserts it into the advice map itself using adv.insert_mem. The storage commitment does not need to be present in the advice map before calling this procedure.

Fix

Removed the Advice map section from the inputs, keeping it only in the outputs where it correctly documents what the procedure produces:

\
Inputs:
Operand stack: [storage_ptr, num_storage_items, SERIAL_NUM, SCRIPT_ROOT]
Outputs:
Operand stack: [RECIPIENT]
Advice map: {
STORAGE_COMMITMENT: [INPUTS],
RECIPIENT: [SERIAL_SCRIPT_HASH, STORAGE_COMMITMENT],
SERIAL_SCRIPT_HASH: [SERIAL_HASH, SCRIPT_ROOT],
SERIAL_HASH: [SERIAL_NUM, EMPTY_WORD],
}
\\

This matches the corrected signature from the issue discussion.

Closes #2693