Skip to content

fix: describe fetch_notes pagination as seq-based - #156

Open
dumanoglu1 wants to merge 1 commit into
0xMiden:mainfrom
dumanoglu1:fix/note-transport-seq-cursor-docs
Open

dumanoglu1 wants to merge 1 commit into
0xMiden:mainfrom
dumanoglu1:fix/note-transport-seq-cursor-docs

Conversation

@dumanoglu1

@dumanoglu1 dumanoglu1 commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What changed

  • Updated the intro docs to describe note pagination with the server-assigned monotonic seq cursor.
  • Updated the node README fetch_notes() bullet to remove the stale timestamp-based pagination wording.

Why

The current implementation paginates with SQLite seq values and only treats timestamp-sized cursors as legacy values. The old wording could make clients infer timestamp-based cursor semantics instead of persisting the server-returned cursor.

Fixes #155

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • rg -n "currently a timestamp|pagination based on a timestamp|node timestamps notes" docs\src\index.md crates\node\README.md
  • mdbook build docs using mdBook 0.4.52 with the configured preprocessors/backends installed

Note: linkcheck reports existing warnings for GitHub-style alert markers such as [!IMPORTANT]; the build exits successfully.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

README and intro docs still describe fetch_notes pagination as timestamp-based

1 participant