Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Arbitrary code execution vulnerability affecting underscore package #133

Open
jrpomeroy opened this issue Apr 1, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

Comments

@jrpomeroy
Copy link

Any hope of getting a fix that replaces nomnom? It's deprecated and depends on a version of underscore that has a high severity vulnerability:

https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-UNDERSCORE-1080984

@coderextreme
Copy link

I am having difficulty building my repos without a good jsonlint, please fix quickly. Thanks!

Simple package.json which will reveal the problem with npm install

$ cat package.json 
{
  "name": "x3dvalidate",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "private": true,
  "dependencies": {
    "jsonlint": "^1.6.3"
  }
}

@coderextreme
Copy link

#120

@sedlakr
Copy link

sedlakr commented Jun 7, 2021

I have analzyed this vulnerability. Underscore is only dev dependency for building jsonlint.js by jison (https://github.com/zaach/jison). It is not used in production code. So I forked repository and created new version and published package under my scope. Look at https://www.npmjs.com/package/@sedlak.r/jsonlint. Hope it will help for someone.
image

@lrntgt
Copy link

lrntgt commented Jun 22, 2021

My guess is that it would be resolved if we publish again the package on npm as version 1.6.4
This would taken into account the recent commits

@christopherwood
Copy link

#141

As noted in the PR, removing package-lock.json lets the package build without the vulnerable dependency.

@doniz
Copy link

doniz commented Mar 8, 2024

And why this still remain unsolved? The issue has been created 3 years ago, no progress.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants