https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/
2.1. What information might this feature expose to Web sites or other parties, and for what purposes is that exposure necessary?
No additional information will be exposed by the proposal. This is just offloading simple things that the fetch handler does.
2.2. Do features in your specification expose the minimum amount of information necessary to enable their intended uses?
Yes. However, the proposal does not change how the browser handles information.
2.3. How do the features in your specification deal with personal information, personally-identifiable information (PII), or information derived from them?
The proposal does not change how the browser handles PII.
n/a
2.5. Do the features in your specification introduce new state for an origin that persists across browsing sessions?
Yes. The proposal asks a user agent to remember how to handle subsequent navigation with ServiceWorkers.
2.6. Do the features in your specification expose information about the underlying platform to origins?
No.
If static routing rules are considered “data”, yes.
No.
Yes. A rule can make the script loaded from the network or cache without executing JavaScript in ServiceWorkers.
No.
2.11. Do features in this specification allow an origin some measure of control over a user agent’s native UI?
No. However, the router rules are shown to chrome://serviceworker-internals and/or devtools for debuggability.
n/a
2.13. How does this specification distinguish between behavior in first-party and third-party contexts?
This follows how a ServiceWorker fetch handler behaves.
2.14. How do the features in this specification work in the context of a browser’s Private Browsing or Incognito mode?
It will not bring any difference with and without the proposal.
2.15. Does this specification have both "Security Considerations" and "Privacy Considerations" sections?
No. However, the original Service Worker specification considers it in 6. Security Considerations. The proposal does not change any security requirements and privacy requirements explained there.
No.
The proposal does not change the behavior of non-”fully active” documents.
No additional questions are needed.