You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 27, 2021. It is now read-only.
Would it be possible to choose weather you want to use wheel diameter or measured distance per pulse, using wheel diameter creates issues with inconsistent wheel sizing and assumptions about gear ratios. I think if you had a field for distance per pulse or pulses per distance you could then use the tuner and get encoder clicks and measure how far you moved it and come up with a better representation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I recommend against that. Wheel diameter and gear ratios are much easier to obtain before running the tests. Finding distance per pulse is a manual process, which means even more work for teams.
I recommend against that. Wheel diameter and gear ratios are much easier to obtain before running the tests. Finding distance per pulse is a manual process, which means even more work for teams.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Would it be possible to choose weather you want to use wheel diameter or measured distance per pulse, using wheel diameter creates issues with inconsistent wheel sizing and assumptions about gear ratios. I think if you had a field for distance per pulse or pulses per distance you could then use the tuner and get encoder clicks and measure how far you moved it and come up with a better representation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: