You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Even though the VirusTotal score is a numeric value, the sorting order is alphanumeric, so when sorted in descending order, 4 is higher than 30, 2 is higher than 100, etc, because column values are represented as a text (e.g. 1 | 74).
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
On the Processes tab, add the VirusTotal column
Sort processes by the VirusTotal column
Depending if you have any processes with a score between 1 and 9 and higher than 10, you should notice the incorrect sorting
Expected behavior
The processes are sorted numerically by the VirusTotal score (the first number before the pipe). Additionally, I would sort processes also by the second number in the same order, as you can see in the example below for the score of 3.
Example:
30 | 75
5 | 75
4 | 74
3 | 74
3 | 72
1 | 74
Screenshots
Desktop
OS: Windows
Version: 10 Pro
Process Hacker: 3.0.4212
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bug Description
Even though the VirusTotal score is a numeric value, the sorting order is alphanumeric, so when sorted in descending order, 4 is higher than 30, 2 is higher than 100, etc, because column values are represented as a text (e.g.
1 | 74
).To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
The processes are sorted numerically by the VirusTotal score (the first number before the pipe). Additionally, I would sort processes also by the second number in the same order, as you can see in the example below for the score of 3.
Example:
Screenshots
Desktop
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: