You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that there were species IDs associated with the 2022 field nest data. This wasn't in the original spreadsheet and some of it doesn't seem to line up with the notes (e.g., a couple of notes indicate ROSP, but the value in the species column is given as GREG).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There was a species column in the 2021 data, so that remained in when I added the 2022 data. I asked Lindsey how to fill it and she said they're all GREG with a few GBHE. She could probably help fill them in more accurately. (@lagarner )
I think it couldn't hurt to have that information. I'm also happy with leaving the field blank for now (we don't need the spID at the moment). I'm just a little worried about having the species ID's declared if we're not sure about them and I noticed 4 nests with ROSP in the notes that are listed as greg in the species column so thought it was worth flagging this to deal with at some point.
I noticed that there were species IDs associated with the 2022 field nest data. This wasn't in the original spreadsheet and some of it doesn't seem to line up with the notes (e.g., a couple of notes indicate ROSP, but the value in the species column is given as GREG).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: