Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle timestamp on a sub-second accuracy #930

Open
DanAvni opened this issue Mar 31, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Handle timestamp on a sub-second accuracy #930

DanAvni opened this issue Mar 31, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@DanAvni
Copy link

DanAvni commented Mar 31, 2024

I am trying to view a clef file with multiple events happened on the same second but different fraction of a second. The events are displayed in the wrong order in the viewer.

The event times I have are
2024-03-26T12:45:16.3088696Z
2024-03-26T12:45:16.3088696Z
2024-03-26T12:45:16.6526179Z
2024-03-26T12:45:16.6682491Z
2024-03-26T12:45:16.6682491Z
2024-03-26T12:45:17.3088673Z
2024-03-26T12:45:17.3088673Z

but the viewer only shows events on a second accuracy and all the events at 2024-03-26T12:45:16 are displayed in the wrong order

@DanAvni DanAvni added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 31, 2024
@DanAvni DanAvni changed the title Handle timestamp on a sub-second level Handle timestamp on a sub-second accuracy Mar 31, 2024
@AshbyGeek
Copy link

This sounds its probably just a formatting issue: the formatting used in the timestamp column doesn't include milliseconds. Would it be crazy to expand this to make the Timestamp formatting customizable? I would be very happy making some logs of mine less verbose by excluding the year, month, and day.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants