Improve detection of preliminary implementation/interoperability reports?

[tripu]

Evaluate @darobin's ideas about this: is it possible/acceptable to find links to preliminary implementation/interoperability reports (or a mention that such report doesn't exist) within the <dl> section at the top of the page?

[tripu]

This wouldn't be difficult to change. But iiuc, pubrules don't expect or even mention info about interoperability/implementation reports in the <dl> section of specs. eg, for recommendations, it expects those pieces of information in the SOTD section.

There are recommendations with that info there. But having that sometimes as an unofficial addition doesn't mean we should enforce it in Specberus, does it?

We can look for that in the <dl> section instead, but I think that is not what pubrules says.

Reassigning to @plehegar for clarification.

[deniak]

@plh is there any chance we can ask editors to use a specific id for these?
Another option would be to use a data- attribute but that would mean asking people to switch their documents to HTML5.