You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our wording in content useable was avoid double negative to express a positive. This came after a lot of thought and back and forth. Do you want to discuss what I remember from the conversation? We found that avoiding double negatives did not work internationally and was very inconsistent even in English.
However the examples are based on the pattern title @aviod double negatives@
The title of the pattern was shortened to fit in the nav bar, but it is the wording of the pattern and not the title that is important. However the fact that we go confused between the two suggests that we need to be more careful with patten names. Can we add that to the structure conversation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was looking at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oKFdfFN-98QZX2vaS77ElheXS_ruKhtObUHEsJjKpp4/edit# on double negatives.
Our wording in content useable was avoid double negative to express a positive. This came after a lot of thought and back and forth. Do you want to discuss what I remember from the conversation? We found that avoiding double negatives did not work internationally and was very inconsistent even in English.
However the examples are based on the pattern title @aviod double negatives@
The title of the pattern was shortened to fit in the nav bar, but it is the wording of the pattern and not the title that is important. However the fact that we go confused between the two suggests that we need to be more careful with patten names. Can we add that to the structure conversation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: