Font fallback should allow selection of a Nastaliq font #276
Labels
doc:arab_ks
doc:arab_ur
doc:arfa
gap
The first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document.
i:fonts
Fonts & font styles
l:arb
Arabic
l:ks
Kashmiri
l:pes
Persian
l:ur
Urdu
p:basic
The gap-analysis priority is Basic.
s:arab
Arabic script (Used for arb + pes)
s:aran
Arabic nastaliq script style
x:alreq
x:arab-ks
x:arab-ug
x:blink
x:css-fonts
x:gecko
x:webkit
This issue is applicable to Urdu, Kashmiri, and other Arabic script orthographies.
Languages such as Urdu and Kashmiri are written in a nastaliq style of Arabic, and authors will typically want any font fallback to select another nastaliq font, rather than a naskh or other font.
More:
The GAP
Currently there is no way to tell the browser to fall back to a nastaliq font, rather than a naskh or other font.
Neither Gecko, Blink, nor Webkit support this. Before they can, CSS needs to provide a way for authors to indicate that a nastaliq generic font should be used.
Priority
This is a high priority for languages such as Urdu and Kashmiri, where nastaliq fonts are the norm, and incorrect substitutions may cause readability and cultural issues. It is also a useful feature for other languages, such as Persian or Kurdish, where nastaliq styles may be used for certain types of text.
Tests & results
Interactive test, font-family:generic(nastaliq) will apply a nastaliq font in Urdu
Action taken
Discussion document: Generic font families
CSS discussion threads:
Bug reports:
Gecko • Blink • Webkit
Outcomes
The CSS Fonts 4 spec now defines a generic(ident) syntax which will be used for newly-introduced, and especially for script-specific, generics.
generic(nastaliq) has been added as one of the generic family names.
Browsers are not yet supporting that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: