Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(i3s): fix for /statistics/summary path #3154

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bortomar-intellmaps
Copy link

No description provided.

@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ const PATH_DESCRIPTIONS: {test: RegExp; extensions: string[]}[] = [
test: /statistics\/f_\d+\/\d+$/,
extensions: ['.json.gz']
},
{
test: /statistics\/summary$/,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Author

@bortomar-intellmaps bortomar-intellmaps Nov 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, I didn't know that but I see it now. I create this pull request based on fix from @dariaterekhova-actionengine. I described the issue in #3148 (reply in thread).

Copy link
Author

@bortomar-intellmaps bortomar-intellmaps Nov 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand that slpk archive from Esri/i3s-spec is not compatible with the standard.
Am I missing something?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this is simply a clean extension of the standard (i.e. an additional optional path that provides additional, non-critical information), then there is no compatibility issues.

It would however be nice to separate these things in the code (using some lightweight mechanism separate files, functions, tables etc) and call it out in comments.

It would also be nice to cover it in the documentation as well:

  • Add a section that lists Esri additions to the standard
  • Mention which ones are supported, and how (if this path is present, how do we use it and what extra capabilities are offered to the user as a result).

@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ const PATH_DESCRIPTIONS: {test: RegExp; extensions: string[]}[] = [
test: /statistics\/f_\d+\/\d+$/,
extensions: ['.json.gz']
},
{
test: /statistics\/summary$/,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this is simply a clean extension of the standard (i.e. an additional optional path that provides additional, non-critical information), then there is no compatibility issues.

It would however be nice to separate these things in the code (using some lightweight mechanism separate files, functions, tables etc) and call it out in comments.

It would also be nice to cover it in the documentation as well:

  • Add a section that lists Esri additions to the standard
  • Mention which ones are supported, and how (if this path is present, how do we use it and what extra capabilities are offered to the user as a result).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants