Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Roadmap to v1 #29

Open
9 tasks
unkcpz opened this issue Jan 25, 2025 · 3 comments
Open
9 tasks

Roadmap to v1 #29

unkcpz opened this issue Jan 25, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@unkcpz
Copy link
Owner

unkcpz commented Jan 25, 2025

v1 is targeting to all legacy features:

  • (additional) pack loose with compression as default
  • zstd as default
  • pack loose and wipe loose when data safety guaranteed
  • backup command
  • doc (rs+py) py is readme only.
  • stub file.
  • check can work with ai**a
  • repack
  • Having v0.x that full compatible with current legecy dos format so the tool can seamlessly switched.
@unkcpz
Copy link
Owner Author

unkcpz commented Jan 28, 2025

Check with https://aiida.discourse.group/t/memory-usage-folderdata-open/524/11. When using rsdos, this type of issue is automatically solved.

@unkcpz
Copy link
Owner Author

unkcpz commented Jan 28, 2025

In version 0.x, I'll keep it maximum compatible with AiiDA usage, so it can read and write to aiida repository as what disk-objectstore is doing now, even though there are some flaw on design such as the compressed algorithm info is not recorded in the packs.

The goal is by switching from legacy dos to rsdos, it seamlessly deal with the aiida-core without file migration required. From rsdos, I'll provide tool in v1 to migrate from 0.x version to v1 version.

@unkcpz
Copy link
Owner Author

unkcpz commented Jan 28, 2025

Or, I just ignore the compatibility with legacy dos. Since it is lacking some key info in the pack db. It would be painful to support it.
In the end, if user create a new profile, it can select to use rsdos or the legacy one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant