Translation of Adguard script filters doesn't always work

[peace2000]

I have noticed, that when uBO loads Adguard script filters through a stock list, uBO will translate them into uBO format in asset viewer, even if the rule is originally in Adguard form.

E.g. see this comparison of FRA: AdGuard Français in uBO's asset viewer:

Original format in GH: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters/blob/master/FrenchFilter/sections/general_extensions.txt

I have no issues with this behavior, but I was wondering that when I copy an Adguard rule into my custom filters, it's showing up in red as if it's invalid:

Also, when I load an Adguard list as a custom list https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters/master/AnnoyancesFilter/Cookies/sections/cookies_specific.txt and view it through uBO's asset viewer, it's scripts are shown in red as well:

Is it intentional that uBO doesn't load AG scriplet filters that have an uBO equivalent and convert them automatically to uBO filters?

(Yes, I know that uBO doesn't support every AG scriplet filter but I'm speaking of those that it does support).

[ghost]

AdGuard has special converter on server side for uBO. Check exactly the link, it will have different ID in URL. (Top right in uBO assets viewer)

[krystian3w]

AG server for ra and rc should be converted with stay / asap stay parameter due AdGuard like "loop" after Alex 302 issue to add mutation observer as default state.

Maybe this should be checked and reported if "slavalenka" don't added injection parameter.

[Yuki2718]

@krystian3w You mean they're not correctly converted? Example?

[krystian3w]

E.g. default behaviour in AG is check reinjection class or attribs, but in uBo nope; so to correct work these arsenal in uBo translation file needed is add stay or asap stay to better compatibility with idea used in AG environment.

[Yuki2718]

Yeah, the default behaviror of AG's ra/rc is almost those with stay on uBO. Maybe you can open an issue.

[krystian3w]

Good luck: AdguardTeam/Scriptlets#245