You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the suggestion. But I find code coverage tricky to count and report. In my experience, they tend to fail to notice various lines were covered. Many projects in Rust don't bother, and I don't think tower should either.
Code coverage as a metric of quality is pretty flaky. It can however be a nice tool in the back of a shed for maintainers to know if they might have some holes that they may wish to cover. But don't think it really is something an "outsider" should take as a mark of quality.
FWIW using something like tarpaulin it is fairly trivial to add a GH action for it :)
Seeing good code coverage will give confidence to other developers to use tower. It might also help find some bugs as we strive to improve coverage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: