Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Change the Sigma(R) call to not need NFW parameters #10

Open
tmcclintock opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Change the Sigma(R) call to not need NFW parameters #10

tmcclintock opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@tmcclintock
Copy link
Owner

Currently the function Sigma_at_R() takes in NFW parameters, despite taking a whole correlation function as input. The NFW parameters are not necessary unless R_perp < r, in which case a model must be assumed (such as NFW) below r[0].

The default behavior should get rid of needing NFW parameters and a method should be implemented to chose the model below the small scale.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tmcclintock