Project context (architecture, commands, conventions, tests) is in CLAUDE.md. This file holds the rules for every coding agent working in this repository.
cp, mv and rm may be aliased with -i on some systems, which leaves an agent waiting for a y/n answer that never comes. Always pass the non-interactive flag:
cp -f source dest
mv -f source dest
rm -f file
rm -rf directory
cp -rf source destOther commands that may prompt: scp and ssh (-o BatchMode=yes), apt-get (-y), brew (HOMEBREW_NO_AUTO_UPDATE=1).
This project uses bd (beads) for issue tracking. Run bd prime to see full workflow context and commands.
bd ready # Find available work
bd show <id> # View issue details
bd update <id> --claim # Claim work
bd close <id> # Complete work- Use
bdfor ALL task tracking — do NOT use TodoWrite, TaskCreate, or markdown TODO lists - Run
bd primefor detailed command reference and session close protocol - Use
bd rememberfor persistent knowledge — do NOT use MEMORY.md files
When ending a work session, you MUST complete ALL steps below. Work is NOT complete until git push succeeds.
MANDATORY WORKFLOW:
- File issues for remaining work - Create issues for anything that needs follow-up
- Run quality gates (if code changed) - Tests, linters, builds
- Update issue status - Close finished work, update in-progress items
- PUSH TO REMOTE - This is MANDATORY:
git pull --rebase bd dolt push git push git status # MUST show "up to date with origin" - Clean up - Clear stashes, prune remote branches
- Verify - All changes committed AND pushed
- Hand off - Provide context for next session
CRITICAL RULES:
- Work is NOT complete until
git pushsucceeds - NEVER stop before pushing - that leaves work stranded locally
- NEVER say "ready to push when you are" - YOU must push
- If push fails, resolve and retry until it succeeds
This project has a knowledge graph. Start with the code-review-graph MCP tools to narrow scope, then read the source. The graph is cheaper than scanning files and gives you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file search cannot.
- Exploring code:
semantic_search_nodes_toolorquery_graph_toolinstead of Grep - Understanding impact:
get_impact_radius_toolinstead of manually tracing imports - Code review:
detect_changes_tool+get_review_context_toolinstead of reading entire files - Finding relationships:
query_graph_toolwith callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for - Architecture questions:
get_architecture_overview_tool+list_communities_tool
- Narrow scope with the graph, then read the source. Do not change code from graph output alone.
- For any non-trivial change, read the implementation and the relevant tests before concluding.
- Verify the exact source when touching behavior, database logic, migrations, retries, fallbacks, recovery, or compatibility code.
- When the graph and the source disagree, the source wins. The graph may be stale or may not model that relationship.
- An empty graph result can mean "not indexed" or "not statically visible", not "does not exist".
| Tool | Use when |
|---|---|
detect_changes_tool |
Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
get_review_context_tool |
Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
get_impact_radius_tool |
Understanding blast radius of a change |
get_affected_flows_tool |
Finding which execution paths are impacted |
query_graph_tool |
Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
semantic_search_nodes_tool |
Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
get_architecture_overview_tool |
Understanding high-level codebase structure |
refactor_tool |
Planning renames, finding dead code |
- The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
- Use
detect_changes_toolfor code review. - Use
get_affected_flows_toolto understand impact. - Use
query_graph_toolpattern="tests_for" to check coverage.