Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Source transparency and upstream tracking for tidal-link #1075

Closed
dvzrv opened this issue Apr 13, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

Source transparency and upstream tracking for tidal-link #1075

dvzrv opened this issue Apr 13, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dvzrv
Copy link

dvzrv commented Apr 13, 2024

Hi! 👋

I maintain the haskell-tidal package on Arch Linux.
For upstream source tracking and especially transparency purposes, it would be great to have specific tags that reflect the releases on hackage for tidal-link, as it is developed in the tree of this repository and is a requirement for tidal.

@matthewkaney
Copy link
Collaborator

Sure—in this case, the new link release was created in tandem with the main v1.9.5 release. Just so I understand you, you'd like a second tag pointing to the same commit that explicitly identifies the link release as well?

Any preference for the naming convention? Something like link-v1.0.3?

@sss-create
Copy link
Collaborator

@dvzrv, is this still in your interest?

@yaxu
Copy link
Member

yaxu commented Feb 5, 2025

Hi @dvzrv another ping on this as we'll release a new tidal-link version soon

@dvzrv
Copy link
Author

dvzrv commented Feb 5, 2025

Hey! Sorry for the delay, I forgot to answer...

Yes, a separate tag that identifies the link release as mentioned in #1075 (comment) would be great!

@yaxu
Copy link
Member

yaxu commented Feb 6, 2025

Ok I think @polymorphicengine will do a tidal-link release a bit before the tidal one this time. Please make a tag on this monorepo when you do that Martin thanks!

@polymorphicengine
Copy link
Collaborator

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants