-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 499
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding Mode
chain definitions
#5910
Comments
Hey @sshmaxime, I'm not sure why we would have Mode's testnet and not Mode but we'd generally like to minimize the number of predefined chain definitions. You can get Mode's chain definition with |
Hello @gregfromstl , you marked this as completed but I'm not seeing it in the latest version of Did I miss something ? Would you please mind adding it ? It's more practical for us to import the chain directly than having them in our own repository. Thanks 🙏 |
Hey @sshmaxime I may have misunderstood. Is there a reason you can't use |
The reason is that I like to have a clean code with the the least customized stuff on our side. We are already implementing few of your chains using |
We like to have clean code too 🙂 Adding named imports for every chain (2,500+) would dramatically increase our repo size and upkeep, as chains have their exceptions/edge cases. That's why we prefer to minimize the number of chains that have named imports (and ideally we would have none). That said, because you seem like a great guy and we already have mode testnet I've opened a PR to add it as a predefined chain: #5982 |
Thank you @gregfromstl 🙏 |
The
Mode
chain definition is missing. It's pretty weird considering you guys havemodeTestnet
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: