Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Movenet Multipose V4 and Jetson performance #30

Open
isra60 opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Movenet Multipose V4 and Jetson performance #30

isra60 opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@isra60
Copy link

isra60 commented Oct 8, 2021

Hi. I've found your repository very useful.

Regarding the different apps in your reop, I see you are interested in Pose Estimation Models.
I'm trying to use the new movenet multipose (https://tfhub.dev/google/movenet/multipose/lightning/1) from google but I've found that the Jetson boards do not benefit from the use of the GPU delegate.
Here (https://qengineering.eu/install-tensorflow-2-lite-on-jetson-nano.html), they are referring to that. But then in your repository, you use the GPU delegate. Do you find improvement in using GPU Delegate instead of standard CPU Delegate or XNNPACK (I don't know if XNNPACK makes sense on a Jetson Board) Delegate on a Jetson Board?

You offer some pose estimation model on tensorRT format. In PINTO repo you can find the Movenet onnx version of the model
(https://github.com/PINTO0309/PINTO_model_zoo/tree/main/137_MoveNet_MultiPose). AFAIK the first thing you need for running TensorRT models is to have the onnx version of the original model. An then? Do you need to make some changes to ONNX model?

Sorry if this is too many questions, but I would like to get the best performance on jetson cards and it is not something so trivial, I imagine you have encountered similar problems. 😅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant